These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15198387)

  • 21. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
    Hickel R; Manhart J
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors influencing the selection of restorative materials in dental care in Finland.
    Forss H; Widström E
    J Dent; 1996 Jul; 24(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 8783530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE; Dahl JE
    Int Dent J; 2000 Dec; 50(6):361-6. PubMed ID: 11197194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Post-Amalgam Era: Norwegian Dentists' Experiences with Composite Resins and Repair of Defective Amalgam Restorations.
    Kopperud SE; Staxrud F; Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Apr; 13(4):441. PubMed ID: 27110804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations - An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters.
    Heintze SD; Loguercio AD; Hanzen TA; Reis A; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):e109-e135. PubMed ID: 35221127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom.
    Wilson NH; Burke FJ; Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10332373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2004 Apr; 112(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 15056118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Time required to remove totally bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth substance loss.
    Krejci I; Lieber CM; Lutz F
    Dent Mater; 1995 Jan; 11(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 7498606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An audit on the placement and replacement of restorations in a general dental practice.
    Frost PM
    Prim Dent Care; 2002 Jan; 9(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 11901789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland.
    Mjör IA; Shen C; Eliasson ST; Richter S
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 11931133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars.
    Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009; 34(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 19953810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure.
    Malament KA; Socransky SS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Oct; 9(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 18297828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation.
    Croll TP; Bar-Zion Y; Segura A; Donly KJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1110-6. PubMed ID: 11575018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Restorative treatment decisions on occlusal caries in Scandinavia.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB; Mejàre I; Sundberg H; Hallonsten AL
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2001 Feb; 59(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 11318041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.