These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Outcome--more than just operative mortality. Brennan MF; Radzyner M; Rubin DM J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):470-7. PubMed ID: 19466735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome (Br J Surg 2007; 94: 145-161). Davies RJ Br J Surg; 2007 May; 94(5):645; author reply 645. PubMed ID: 17443877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of outcomes research in improving patient care. Scardino PT; Bianco F Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2006 May; 3(5):233. PubMed ID: 16691214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Fewer, but more specialized surgeons after the millennium shift]. Haglund U Lakartidningen; 1999 Sep; 96(36):3762-4. PubMed ID: 10500393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the quality of surgical care. Fink AS; Itani KM; Campbell DC Surg Clin North Am; 2007 Aug; 87(4):837-52, vi. PubMed ID: 17888783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of cancer surgery: challenges and controversies. Giacomantonio CA; Temple WJ Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2000 Jan; 9(1):51-60, vii. PubMed ID: 10601524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The quality of surgery: challenges and controversies. Proot L Acta Chir Belg; 2000; 100(6):237-8. PubMed ID: 11236174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome rates for individual surgeons: concerns about accuracy, completeness, and consequences of disclosure. Choudhry NK; Wright JG; Singer PA Surgery; 1994 Mar; 115(3):406-8. PubMed ID: 8128367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving surgical outcomes for cancer in the United States. Chang AE J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 95(2):91-2. PubMed ID: 17262738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Myth and reality in general surgery. Wheeler HB Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 May; 78(5):21-7. PubMed ID: 10171433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome after resection of a solid tumor: volume, specialization, or both? Taylor I Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2000 Jan; 9(1):27-32, vi. PubMed ID: 10601522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is volume the most important predictor of outcome in cancer management? Greene FL J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 97(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 17657736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. System for outcomes-based surgical report care developed by the Governor's Committee on Socioeconomic Issues. Tunner WS; Christy JP; Whipple TL Bull Am Coll Surg; 1997 Aug; 82(8):18-33. PubMed ID: 10173115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of surgical interventions in Denmark]. Utzon J; Olsen PS; Bay-Nielsen M; Andersen KB; Christensen B; Endahl LA; Krarup T; Lucht U; Ottesen BS; Schroeder TV; Kehlet H Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Oct; 163(41):5662-4. PubMed ID: 11665468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment tools in the training of surgical oncologists: educating trainees and educators. Curley SA Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1085-7. PubMed ID: 19127362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The importance of volume for outcome in cancer surgery--an overview. Järhult J Eur J Surg Oncol; 1996 Jun; 22(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 8654596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]