These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15199938)

  • 1. Informed confusion: the doctrine of informed consent in Georgia.
    Richards JH
    Georgia Law Rev; 2003; 37(3):1129-66. PubMed ID: 15199938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practice makes perfect: experience-related information should fall within the purview of Pennsylvania's doctrine of informed consent.
    Rostolsky BM
    Duquesne Law Rev; 2002; 40(3):543-60. PubMed ID: 15212018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When the surgeon has HIV: what to tell patients about the risk of exposure and the risk of transmission.
    McIntosh PL
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1996 Feb; 44(2):315-64. PubMed ID: 16086529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pushing the limits of informed consent: Johnson v. Kokemoor and physician-specific disclosure.
    Heinemann RA
    Wis L Rev; 1997; 5():1079-121. PubMed ID: 16329220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consent to elective surgery valid even if doctor didn't warn of known risks.
    Hodge RL
    Mercer Law Rev; 1976; 28(1):377-81. PubMed ID: 11664784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physician gag clauses--the hypocrisy of the Hippocratic Oath.
    Swanson DS
    South Ill Univ Law J; 1997; 21():313-34. PubMed ID: 16086489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The great "informed consent" debate: should the disclosure of risks and alternatives by physicians be standard pre-operating procedure?
    Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1983 Apr; 72(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 6854163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dries v. Gregor: a case study of informed consent doctrine in New York.
    Schreiber JA
    N Y State Bar J; 1981 Oct; 53(6):431-7. PubMed ID: 16044597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The doctrine of informed consent: to inform or not to inform?
    Walter P
    St Johns Law Rev; 1997 Sep; 71(3):543-90. PubMed ID: 15732186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissing disclosure: just what the doctor ordered.
    Morris GH
    Ariz Law Rev; 2002; 44(2):313-71. PubMed ID: 15929239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent in Oklahoma: a search for reasonableness and predictability in the aftermath of Scott v. Bradford.
    Fisher ES
    Oklahoma Law Rev; 1996; 49(4):651-75. PubMed ID: 16437817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Informed consent: what must a physician disclose to a patient?
    Murray B
    Virtual Mentor; 2012 Jul; 14(7):563-6. PubMed ID: 23351294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Jury clears cancer center of failing to tell participants of clinical-trial risks.
    Blumenstyk G; Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2004 Apr; 50(33):A33. PubMed ID: 15287145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study.
    Robertson GB
    Osgoode Hall Law J; 1984; 22(1):139-61. PubMed ID: 16044612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The two faces of gag provisions: patients and physicians in a bind.
    Brand GS; Munoz GM; Nichols MG; Okata MU; Pitt JB; Seager S
    Yale Law Policy Rev; 1998; 17():249-80. PubMed ID: 16437824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Informed consent" to medical treatment: the Oregon standard of disclosure.
    Rollema MT
    Oregon Law Rev; 1978; 57(2):322-33. PubMed ID: 11664993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Georgia's new Informed Consent Statute.
    Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1988 May; 77(5):322-4. PubMed ID: 3392490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finding clarity in a Gray opinion: a critique of Pennsylvania's informed consent doctrine.
    Kottkamp NA
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1999; 61(1):241-85. PubMed ID: 16514782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recent developments in Tennessee's doctrine of informed consent.
    Porch DS
    Univ Memphis Law Rev; 2000; 30(3):593-623. PubMed ID: 16526144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sterilization regulation: government efforts to guarantee informed consent.
    Prendergast MH
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1978; 18(4):971-96. PubMed ID: 11665024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.