331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15200041)
1. Prediction of survival in gastric carcinoma related to lymph node grading by the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer System or the Japanese system.
Celen O; Yildirim E; Gülben K; Berberoğlu U
Eur J Surg Suppl; 2003 Jul; (588):33-9. PubMed ID: 15200041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Cancer Study Group.
Roder JD; Böttcher K; Busch R; Wittekind C; Hermanek P; Siewert JR
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 82(4):621-31. PubMed ID: 9477092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems.
Ikeguchi M; Murakami D; Kanaji S; Ohro S; Maeta Y; Yamaguchi K; Tatebe S; Kondo A; Tsujitani S; Kaibara N
ANZ J Surg; 2004 Oct; 74(10):852-4. PubMed ID: 15456431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic impact of positive lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma.
Celen O; Yildirim E; Berberoglu U
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Aug; 96(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 17443727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative effect of lymph node metastasis classified by the anatomical site or by the number of nodes involved on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.
Hidaka H; Eto T; Maehara N; Jimi S; Hotokezaka M; Chijiiwa K
Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(88):2269-72. PubMed ID: 19260520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum number of lymph nodes that should be examined for the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification of gastric carcinoma.
Ichikura T; Ogawa T; Chochi K; Kawabata T; Sugasawa H; Mochizuki H
World J Surg; 2003 Mar; 27(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 12607061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification.
Ichikura T; Tomimatsu S; Uefuji K; Kimura M; Uchida T; Morita D; Mochizuki H
Cancer; 1999 Aug; 86(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 10440681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric carcinoma.
Hayashi H; Ochiai T; Suzuki T; Shimada H; Hori S; Takeda A; Miyazawa Y
Surgery; 2000 Feb; 127(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 10686976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the new seventh AJCC/UICC staging system appropriate for patients with gastric cancer?
Yoon HM; Ryu KW; Nam BH; Cho SJ; Park SR; Lee JY; Lee JH; Kook MC; Choi IJ; Kim YW
J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Jan; 214(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 22036661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Problems in the N-classification of the new 1997 UICC TNM stage classification for gastric cancer: an analysis of over 10 years' outcome of Japanese patients.
Nio Y; Yamasawa K; Yamaguchi K; Itakura M; Omori H; Koike M; Kitamura Y; Tsuji M; Endo S; Ogo Y; Yano S; Sumi S
Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(1B):697-705. PubMed ID: 12680170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metastatic lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer.
Asoglu O; Karanlik H; Parlak M; Kecer M; Muslumanoglu M; Igci A; Ozmen V; Gulluoglu M; Kapran Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(91-92):908-13. PubMed ID: 19621727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The study of the minimum number of examined lymph nodes for the TNM classification of gastric cancer].
Chen B; Sun JY; Jin F; Xu HM; Wang SB
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 43(11):702-5. PubMed ID: 16008956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of liver transplantation in 490 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: validation of a uniform staging after surgical treatment.
Vauthey JN; Ribero D; Abdalla EK; Jonas S; Bharat A; Schumacher G; Lerut J; Chapman WC; Hemming AW; Neuhaus P
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 May; 204(5):1016-27; discussion 1027-8. PubMed ID: 17481532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the UICC/AJCC 1992 and 1997 pN categories for gastric cancer patients after surgery.
Wu CW; Hsieh MC; Lo SS; Shen KH; Lui WY; P'eng FK
Hepatogastroenterology; 2001; 48(37):279-84. PubMed ID: 11268985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection.
Sun Z; Xu Y; Li de M; Wang ZN; Zhu GL; Huang BJ; Li K; Xu HM
Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(11):2571-80. PubMed ID: 20336791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.
Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N
Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma.
Katai H; Yoshimura K; Maruyama K; Sasako M; Sano T
Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1796-800. PubMed ID: 10760754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Relationship between metastatic rate and amount of lymph nodes and prognosis of gastric cancer].
Li K; Xu HM; Chen JQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 85(30):2113-6. PubMed ID: 16313820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer?
Huang B; Zheng X; Wang Z; Wang M; Dong Y; Zhao B; Xu H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18998065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma.
Kato M; Saji S; Kawaguchi Y; Kunieda K; Sugiyama Y; Takagi Y; Hiraoka T; Kumazawa I; Adachi T
Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(30):3281-6. PubMed ID: 10626202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]