200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15200406)
1. Mechanisms determining the ratio of conductivity clearance to urea clearance.
Gotch FA; Panlilio FM; Buyaki RA; Wang EX; Folden TI; Levin NW
Kidney Int Suppl; 2004 Jul; (89):S3-S24. PubMed ID: 15200406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between effective ionic dialysance and in vivo urea clearance during hemodialysis.
Lindsay RM; Bene B; Goux N; Heidenheim AP; Landgren C; Sternby J
Am J Kidney Dis; 2001 Sep; 38(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 11532690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hemodialysis blood access flow rates can be estimated accurately from on-line dialysate urea measurements and the knowledge of effective dialyzer urea clearance.
Lindsay RM; Sternby J; Olde B; Persson R; Thatcher ME; Sargent K
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Sep; 1(5):960-4. PubMed ID: 17699313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between urea clearance and ionic dialysance determined using a single-step conductivity profile.
Di Filippo S; Pozzoni P; Manzoni C; Andrulli S; Pontoriero G; Locatelli F
Kidney Int; 2005 Nov; 68(5):2389-95. PubMed ID: 16221245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dialyzer clearances and mass transfer-area coefficients for small solutes at low dialysate flow rates.
Leypoldt JK; Kamerath CD; Gilson JF; Friederichs G
ASAIO J; 2006; 52(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 16883120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to determine ionic dialysance for the online assessment of delivered dialysis dose.
Di Filippo S; Manzoni C; Andrulli S; Pontoriero G; Dell'Oro C; La Milia V; Bacchini G; Crepaldi M; Bigi MC; Locatelli F
Kidney Int; 2001 Feb; 59(2):774-82. PubMed ID: 11168961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increases in mass transfer-area coefficients and urea Kt/V with increasing dialysate flow rate are greater for high-flux dialyzers.
Leypoldt JK; Cheung AK
Am J Kidney Dis; 2001 Sep; 38(3):575-9. PubMed ID: 11532691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increasing dialysate flow rate increases dialyzer urea mass transfer-area coefficients during clinical use.
Ouseph R; Ward RA
Am J Kidney Dis; 2001 Feb; 37(2):316-20. PubMed ID: 11157372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radionuclide method for evaluating the performance of hemodialysis in vivo.
Bihl GR; Bird NJ; Peters C; Bradley JR; Peters AM
Kidney Int; 2005 Feb; 67(2):721-31. PubMed ID: 15673322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Future directions in dialysis quantification.
Lindsay RM; Sternby J
Semin Dial; 2001; 14(4):300-7. PubMed ID: 11489207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of novel manufacturing technology on blood and dialysate flow distribution in a new low flux "alpha Polysulfone" hemodialyzer.
Gastaldon F; Brendolan A; Crepaldi C; Frisone P; Zamboni S; d'Intini V; Poulin S; Hector R; Granziero A; Martins K; Gellert R; Inguaggiato P; Ronco C
Int J Artif Organs; 2003 Feb; 26(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 12653343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increasing dialysate flow rate increases dialyzer urea clearance and dialysis efficiency: an in vivo study.
Azar AT
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2009 Nov; 20(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 19861865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of increasing dialyzer mass transfer area coefficient and dialysate flow on clearance of protein-bound solutes: a pilot crossover trial.
Luo FJ; Patel KP; Marquez IO; Plummer NS; Hostetter TH; Meyer TW
Am J Kidney Dis; 2009 Jun; 53(6):1042-9. PubMed ID: 19394728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new method of post-dialysis blood urea sampling: the 'stop dialysate flow' method.
Geddes CC; Traynor J; Walbaum D; Fox JG; Mactier RA
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2000 Apr; 15(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 10727547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dialyzer performance in the HEMO Study: in vivo K0A and true blood flow determined from a model of cross-dialyzer urea extraction.
Depner TA; Greene T; Daugirdas JT; Cheung AK; Gotch FA; Leypoldt JK
ASAIO J; 2004; 50(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 14763497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ionic dialysance: which relationship with effective urea clearance?].
Pozzoni P; Pozzi M; Di Filippo S
G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21 Suppl 30():S231-5. PubMed ID: 15750994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blood and dialysate flow distributions in hollow-fiber hemodialyzers analyzed by computerized helical scanning technique.
Ronco C; Brendolan A; Crepaldi C; Rodighiero M; Scabardi M
J Am Soc Nephrol; 2002 Jan; 13 Suppl 1():S53-61. PubMed ID: 11792763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys?
Locatelli F; Buoncristiani U; Canaud B; Köhler H; Petitclerc T; Zucchelli P
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 Jan; 20(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 15632348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ionic dialysance vs urea clearance in the absence of cardiopulmonary recirculation.
Mercadal L; Du Montcel ST; Jaudon MC; Hamani A; Izzedine H; Deray G; Béné B; Petitclerc T
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2002 Jan; 17(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 11773472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of plasma sodium concentration during hemodialysis by computerization of dialysate conductivity.
Goureau Y; Petitclerc T; Man NK
ASAIO Trans; 1990; 36(3):M444-7. PubMed ID: 2252723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]