BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

577 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15200658)

  • 1. Pentobarbital vs chloral hydrate for sedation of children undergoing MRI: efficacy and recovery characteristics.
    Malviya S; Voepel-Lewis T; Tait AR; Reynolds PI; Gujar SK; Gebarski SS; Petter Eldevik O
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2004 Jul; 14(7):589-95. PubMed ID: 15200658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of oral chloral hydrate and sublingual midazolam sedation for echocardiogram in children.
    Layangool T; Sangtawesin C; Kirawittaya T; Prompan W; Attachoo A; Pechdamrongsakul A; Intasorn Y; Hanchai P; Ounjareon C; Noisang P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Oct; 91 Suppl 3():S45-52. PubMed ID: 19255992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of propofol with pentobarbital/midazolam/fentanyl sedation for magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in children.
    Pershad J; Wan J; Anghelescu DL
    Pediatrics; 2007 Sep; 120(3):e629-36. PubMed ID: 17698968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oral sedation with midazolam and diphenhydramine compared with midazolam alone in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.
    Cengiz M; Baysal Z; Ganidagli S
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2006 Jun; 16(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 16719877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sedation and anesthesia protocols used for magnetic resonance imaging studies in infants: provider and pharmacologic considerations.
    Dalal PG; Murray D; Cox T; McAllister J; Snider R
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Oct; 103(4):863-8. PubMed ID: 17000795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propofol vs pentobarbital for sedation of children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: results from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium.
    Mallory MD; Baxter AL; Kost SI;
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 19(6):601-11. PubMed ID: 19645979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of chloral hydrate and pentobarbital sedation for pediatric echocardiography.
    Ganigara M; Srivastava S; Malik P; Fong S; Ko H; Parness I; Shenoy R
    Echocardiography; 2019 Apr; 36(4):766-769. PubMed ID: 30803010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sedation of neurologically impaired children undergoing MRI: a sequential approach.
    Cortellazzi P; Lamperti M; Minati L; Falcone C; Pantaleoni C; Caldiroli D
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2007 Jul; 17(7):630-6. PubMed ID: 17564644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation for diagnostic imaging studies in children.
    Malviya S; Voepel-Lewis T; Prochaska G; Tait AR
    Pediatrics; 2000 Mar; 105(3):E42. PubMed ID: 10699144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the safety, efficacy and recovery of intranasal midazolam vs. oral chloral hydrate and promethazine.
    Dallman JA; Ignelzi MA; Briskie DM
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 11699169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Sedation with oral hydroxyzine and rectal chloral hydrate in pediatric MRI and CT].
    Dacher JN; Neuenschwander S; Monroc M; Vanier A; Eurin D; Le Dosseur P
    J Radiol; 1996 Dec; 77(12):1189-92; discussion 1193-4. PubMed ID: 9033878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children.
    Fong CY; Tay CG; Ong LC; Lai NM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD011786. PubMed ID: 29099542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infant sedation for MR imaging and CT: oral versus intravenous pentobarbital.
    Mason KP; Zurakowski D; Connor L; Karian VE; Fontaine PJ; Sanborn PA; Burrows PE
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):723-8. PubMed ID: 15516603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of submucosal midazolam on behavior and physiologic response when combined with oral chloral hydrate and nitrous oxide sedation.
    Myers GR; Maestrello CL; Mourino AP; Best AM
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 15080356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Superiority of pentobarbital versus chloral hydrate for sedation in infants during imaging.
    Mason KP; Sanborn P; Zurakowski D; Karian VE; Connor L; Fontaine PJ; Burrows PE
    Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):537-42. PubMed ID: 14699175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sedation medication received and adverse events related to sedation for brain MRI in children with and without developmental disabilities.
    Kannikeswaran N; Mahajan PV; Sethuraman U; Groebe A; Chen X
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Mar; 19(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 19143958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sedation with oral chloral hydrate in children undergoing MRI scanning.
    Low E; O'Driscoll M; MacEneaney P; O'Mahony O
    Ir Med J; 2008 Mar; 101(3):80-2. PubMed ID: 18540545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is administration of enteric contrast material safe before abdominal CT in children who require sedation? Experience with chloral hydrate and pentobarbital.
    Ziegler MA; Fricke BL; Donnelly LF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jan; 180(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 12490468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine to midazolam regimens for oral sedation of pediatric dental patients.
    Chowdhury J; Vargas KG
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16173222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gamma-hydroxybutyrate versus chlorprothixene/phenobarbital sedation in children undergoing MRI studies.
    Meyer S; Gottschling S; Georg T; Lothschütz D; Graf N; Sitzmann FC
    Klin Padiatr; 2003; 215(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 12677545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.