These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1520117)

  • 41. Subjective and objective visual acuity testing techniques.
    Khan SG; Chen KF; Frenkel M
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1976 Dec; 94(12):2086-91. PubMed ID: 999554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Test charts for distance preferred for low-vision.
    Fonda G
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1987 May; 19(5):178-80. PubMed ID: 3592477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.
    Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH
    Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Establishment of the sweep pattern visual evoked potential system and its application].
    Li XP; Zhang C; Hu J; Wu J; Zhu YM; Li HS
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 25(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 19537243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity as measures of vision impairment and predictors of visual disability.
    Rubin GS; Muñoz B; Bandeen-Roche K; West SK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 41(11):3327-34. PubMed ID: 11006221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Reference values in vision development of infants with clinical use of the Teller Acuity Cards].
    Grunewald SM; Mayer UM
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jun; 210(6):376-83. PubMed ID: 9333664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Outcomes of a vision screening program for underserved populations in the United States.
    Friedman DS; Cassard SD; Williams SK; Baldonado K; O'Brien RW; Gower EW
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 20(4):201-11. PubMed ID: 23865601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contrast sensitivity vision testing: new screening technology for family physicians.
    Block DJ; Bosworth MF
    Am Fam Physician; 1992 Feb; 45(2):655-9. PubMed ID: 1739050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical use of visual acuity measured with pupil responses.
    Slooter J
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1981 Mar; 50(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 7227178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Strategies to improve the accuracy of vision measurement by teachers in rural Chinese secondary schoolchildren: Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study (X-PRES) report no. 6.
    Sharma A; Li L; Song Y; Choi K; Lam DS; Zhang M; Zheng M; Zhou Z; Liu X; Wu B; Congdon N
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2008 Oct; 126(10):1434-40. PubMed ID: 18852423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Distance and near visual acuity in infantile nystagmus.
    Hanson KS; Bedell HE; White JM; Ukwade MT
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):823-9. PubMed ID: 17106409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Contrast sensitivity measured by two different test methods in healthy, young adults with normal visual acuity.
    Koefoed VF; Baste V; Roumes C; Høvding G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 93(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 25056525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Development and sensitivity to visual impairment of the Low Vision Functional Status Evaluation (LVFSE).
    Ross CK; Stelmack JA; Stelmack TR; Guihan M; Fraim M
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Apr; 76(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 10333183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A nationwide population-based survey on visual acuity, near vision, and self-reported visual function in the adult population in Finland.
    Laitinen A; Koskinen S; Härkänen T; Reunanen A; Laatikainen L; Aromaa A
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Dec; 112(12):2227-37. PubMed ID: 16325714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic.
    Bailey IL; Lovie-Kitchin JE
    Vision Res; 2013 Sep; 90():2-9. PubMed ID: 23685164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Discriminative power of reading tests to differentiate visual impairment caused by cataract and age-related macular degeneration.
    Stifter E; Weghaupt H; Benesch T; Thaler A; Radner W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Nov; 31(11):2111-9. PubMed ID: 16412924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effectiveness of a pinhole method for visual acuity screening.
    Loewenstein JI; Palmberg PF; Connett JE; Wentworth DN
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1985 Feb; 103(2):222-3. PubMed ID: 3977693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
    Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Brown G; Robson C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 20444125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Usefulness of computerized visual acuity testing in a pediatric ophthalmology clinic.
    Raymond JE; Shapiro KL
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1988 Aug; 23(5):213-5. PubMed ID: 3052744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Objective measurement of visual acuity by optokinetic response determination in patients with ocular diseases.
    Shin YJ; Park KH; Hwang JM; Wee WR; Lee JH; Lee IB
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Feb; 141(2):327-32. PubMed ID: 16458689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.