154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15201947)
1. [High resolution reconstruction of PET images using the iterative OSEM algorithm].
Doll J; Henze M; Bublitz O; Werling A; Adam LE; Haberkorn U; Semmler W; Brix G
Nuklearmedizin; 2004 Jun; 43(3):72-8. PubMed ID: 15201947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Optimization of PET image quality by means of 3D data acquisition and iterative image reconstruction].
Doll J; Zaers J; Trojan H; Bellemann ME; Adam LE; Haberkorn U; Brix G
Nuklearmedizin; 1998 Mar; 37(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 9547752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of scanner characteristics in iterative image reconstruction for high-resolution positron emission tomography studies of small animals.
Brix G; Doll J; Bellemann ME; Trojan H; Haberkorn U; Schmidlin P; Ostertag H
Eur J Nucl Med; 1997 Jul; 24(7):779-86. PubMed ID: 9211765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling.
Boellaard R; van Lingen A; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):808-17. PubMed ID: 11337581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noise reduction in oncology FDG PET images by iterative reconstruction: a quantitative assessment.
Riddell C; Carson RE; Carrasquillo JA; Libutti SK; Danforth DN; Whatley M; Bacharach SL
J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):1316-23. PubMed ID: 11535719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The SRT reconstruction algorithm for semiquantification in PET imaging.
Kastis GA; Gaitanis A; Samartzis AP; Fokas AS
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5970-82. PubMed ID: 26429272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quantitative evaluation of block-iterative reconstruction image in PET: comparison of the dynamic RAMLA algorithm and OSEM algorithm].
Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Shimizu K; Murase K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Oct; 63(10):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18187896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification and reduction of the collimator-detector response effect in SPECT by applying a system model during iterative image reconstruction: a simulation study.
Kalantari F; Rajabi H; Saghari M
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Mar; 33(3):228-38. PubMed ID: 22134173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance evaluation of OSEM reconstruction algorithm incorporating three-dimensional distance-dependent resolution compensation for brain SPECT: a simulation study.
Yokoi T; Shinohara H; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2002 Feb; 16(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 11922203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.
Altazi BA; Zhang GG; Fernandez DC; Montejo ME; Hunt D; Werner J; Biagioli MC; Moros EG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for
Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A practical way to improve contrast-to-noise ratio and quantitation for statistical-based iterative reconstruction in whole-body PET imaging.
Fin L; Bailly P; Daouk J; Meyer ME
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3072-9. PubMed ID: 19673206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The usefulness of fully three-dimensional OSEM algorithm on lymph node metastases from lung cancer with 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Inoue K; Moriya E; Suzuki T; Ohnuki Y; Sato T; Kitamura H; Sasaki T; Fukushi M; Moriyama N; Fujii H
Ann Nucl Med; 2011 May; 25(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 21234724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 3-D reconstruction with 3D-OSEM and with FORE+OSEM for PET.
Liu X; Comtat C; Michel C; Kinahan P; Defrise M; Townsend D
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):804-14. PubMed ID: 11513031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection.
Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of PET/CT image quality using the GE 'Sharp IR' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm.
Vennart NJ; Bird N; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Nowosinska E; Heard S
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):471-479. PubMed ID: 28394818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Accuracy of Resolution Recovery in PSF-based Fully-3D PET Image Reconstruction: Simulation and Phantom Study in Multicenter Trial].
Kangai Y; Odajima S; Matsutomo N; Kamiya T; Mizuta T; Onishi H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 72(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 27000669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
