These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15202154)

  • 1. Comparison of simulated respirator fit factors using aerosol and vapor challenges.
    Gardner PD; Hofacre KC; Richardson AW
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 15202154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles.
    Balazy A; Toivola M; Reponen T; Podgórski A; Zimmer A; Grinshpun SA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 16344291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of pressure drop and filtration efficiency of particulate respirators using welding fumes and sodium chloride.
    Cho HW; Yoon CS; Lee JH; Lee SJ; Viner A; Johnson EW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):666-80. PubMed ID: 21742627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
    Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of leak location on measured respirator fit.
    Crutchfield CD; Park DL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Jun; 58(6):413-7. PubMed ID: 9183835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of aerosol size distribution and measurement method on respirator fit.
    Holton PM; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):855-60. PubMed ID: 3687730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Lee K; Slavcev A; Nicas M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 15202153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prototype sampling system for measuring workplace protection factors for gases and vapors.
    Groves WA; Reynolds SJ
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 12746083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of dust respirators with facial seal leaks: I. Experimental.
    Hinds WC; Kraske G
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):836-41. PubMed ID: 3687728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laboratory and field evaluation of a new personal sampling system for assessing the protection provided by the N95 filtering facepiece respirators against particles.
    Lee SA; Grinshpun SA; Adhikari A; Li W; McKay R; Maynard A; Reponen T
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Apr; 49(3):245-57. PubMed ID: 15668259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between quantitative fit factors and workplace protection factors measured in actual workplace environments at a steel foundry.
    Zhuang Z; Coffey CC; Jensen PA; Campbell DL; Lawrence RB; Myers WR
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 14674806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Campbell DL; Jensen PA; Myers WR
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 12363214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of known exhalation valve damage using a negative pressure user seal check method on full facepiece respirators.
    Delaney LJ; McKay RT; Freeman A
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Apr; 18(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 12637234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators by photometric and number-based test methods.
    Rengasamy S; Miller A; Eimer BC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jan; 8(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 21154105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Collection of three bacterial aerosols by respirator and surgical mask filters under varying conditions of flow and relative humidity.
    McCullough NV; Brosseau LM; Vesley D
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1997 Dec; 41(6):677-90. PubMed ID: 9375526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a quantitative fit testing method for N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Janssen L; Luinenburg MD; Mullins HE; Danisch SG; Nelson TJ
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 12908863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are quantitative fit factors predictive of respirator fit during simulated healthcare activities?
    Sietsema M; Brosseau LM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Dec; 15(12):803-809. PubMed ID: 30142034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Release of simulated anthrax particles from disposable respirators.
    Kennedy NJ; Hinds WC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 15202151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-approved and CE-marked particulate filtering facepiece respirators.
    Rengasamy S; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 19261695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between respirator fit and respirator fit test panel cells by respirator size.
    Zhuang Z; Groce D; Ahlers HW; Iskander W; Landsittel D; Guffey S; Benson S; Viscusi D; Shaffer RE
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Oct; 5(10):617-28. PubMed ID: 18666022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.