These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15202448)

  • 21. The proposed BSCC terminology for abnormal cervical cytology.
    Denton K
    Cytopathology; 2008 Dec; 19(6):398-9. PubMed ID: 19040547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The prevention of cervical cancer: the place of the cytological smear test.
    Hudson E
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Mar; 12(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 3888487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Removal of blood components from cervical smears: implications for cancer diagnosis using FTIR spectroscopy.
    Romeo MJ; Wood BR; Quinn MA; McNaughton D
    Biopolymers; 2003; 72(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 12400093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A multi-spectral approach for scene analysis of cervical cytology smears.
    Aggarwal RK; Bacus JW
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1977 Jul; 25(7):668-80. PubMed ID: 330720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tests may replace Pap smears.
    AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2000 May; 14(5):286. PubMed ID: 10833822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Thin layer cytology of the cervix uteri].
    Bergeron C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Oct; 28(10):760-4. PubMed ID: 11244640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inadequate cervical smears: results of an educational slide exchange scheme. Trent Gynaecological Pathology Quality Assurance Group.
    Cytopathology; 1999 Feb; 10(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10068883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Daily peer review of abnormal cervical smears in the assessment of individual practice as an additional method of internal quality control.
    Confortini M; Di Stefano C; Biggeri A; Bulgaresi P; Di Claudio G; Grisotto L; Maddau C; Matucci M; Petreschi C; Troni GM; Turco P; Foxi P
    Cytopathology; 2016 Feb; 27(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 25123613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. QUANTITATIVE CYTOCHEMICAL STUDIES ON NORMAL, MALIGNANT, PREMALIGNANT AND ATYPICAL CELL POPULATIONS FROM THE HUMAN UTERINE CERVIX.
    CASPERSSON O
    Acta Cytol; 1964; 8():45-60. PubMed ID: 14110625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Overview of the cytology laboratory: specimen processing through diagnosis.
    Joste N
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):549-63; viii. PubMed ID: 19061816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In-house quality assurance program in a state cytology laboratory.
    Gardner NM
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):487-8. PubMed ID: 2750439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Re: the editorial in number 4, volume 28, 2008. "Cervical cancer control in Colombia: achievements and challenges of cytology based programs"].
    Calvache AE
    Biomedica; 2009 Mar; 29(1):161-2; author reply 162-3. PubMed ID: 19753849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Studies on nuclear structure by staining for acidic protein in the vaginal smear.
    Morishita H; Ouchi M; Yoshida J; Umezu K; Yoneda M; Adachi H
    Acta Cytol; 1970 Feb; 14(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 4190438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interpretation of vaginal smears in the diagnosis of cervical cancer: sensitivity vs. specificity.
    PORTER JE
    Am Pract Dig Treat; 1956 Jul; 7(7):1135-8. PubMed ID: 13327205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The false negative smear: an instrumental error?
    Rubio CA
    Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(4):500-1. PubMed ID: 269598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
    Altermatt HJ; Wyler K; Fravi R; Liu X; Kraft R; Dreher E
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Exfoliative cytology in the uterine cervix. Possibilities, limitations and clinical consequences of a morphologic method].
    Schuhmann RA
    Pathologe; 1981 Dec; 3(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 7036131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Experience with new technologies within the context of Swiss practice and conclusions].
    Weintraub J
    Ann Pathol; 1999; 19(5 Suppl):S96-8. PubMed ID: 10599466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automated cervical cytology screening--a gilded or gelded Trojan horse?
    du Toit GC
    S Afr Med J; 1996 Sep; 86(9):1138-40. PubMed ID: 8888795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [New nomenclature in gynecologic cytology].
    Breitenecker G; Dinges HP; Gitsch G
    Gynakol Rundsch; 1990; 30 Suppl 1():162-4. PubMed ID: 2079254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.