These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15202567)

  • 21. The need for the persons involved as reviewers in the peer-review system to disclose potential conflicts of interest regarding the manuscript or the authors.
    Murphy EJ
    Lipids; 2008 Feb; 43(2):105-6. PubMed ID: 18236093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [More stringent requirements concerning manuscripts. Declarations of potential connections and conflicts of interest published in the Lakartidningen].
    Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Agren H; Ostergren J
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Apr; 99(15):1662-3. PubMed ID: 12025190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
    Clarke SP
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Regulatory reinforcement of journal conflict of interest disclosures: How could disclosure of interests work better in medicine, epidemiology and public health?
    Wagner W; McGarity T
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Aug; 63(8):606-7. PubMed ID: 19596841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Re: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.
    Merkel-Sobotta E
    Int J Occup Environ Health; 2003; 9(4):390; author reply 390-1. PubMed ID: 14664494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Difficult meeting between science and market forces].
    Persson A; Welin S
    Lakartidningen; 2002 May; 99(18):2022-6. PubMed ID: 12082778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Peer review reviewed by a peer.
    Fogelholm M
    Obes Rev; 2010 Mar; 11(3):169-70. PubMed ID: 20433657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The good, the bad and the ugly.
    Gmel G
    Addiction; 2010 Feb; 105(2):203-5; author reply 205-6. PubMed ID: 20078477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Authors, industry, and review articles.
    DeMaria AN
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 43(6):1130-1. PubMed ID: 15028380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.
    Foote M; Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):703-4; author reply 704. PubMed ID: 15969869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
    Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reviewing scientific manuscripts.
    Castagnetti M; Bagli D; Fossum M;
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Apr; 14(2):133-134. PubMed ID: 29429827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [More and more researchers are tempted to cheat. Tougher competition concerning resource allocation and career possibilities].
    Zetterström R
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Mar; 100(11):920-2. PubMed ID: 15148717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Journals lack explicit policies for separating eds from ads.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7033):549. PubMed ID: 15800585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reviewing manuscripts for Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.
    Cummings P; Rivara FP
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2002 Jan; 156(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 11772184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Expert bias in peer review.
    Phillips JS
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Dec; 27(12):2229-33. PubMed ID: 21992074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The ethics of peer review: What to know before saying "yes".
    Siedlecki SL
    Nursing; 2015 Dec; 45(12):51-4. PubMed ID: 26580113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conflicts of interest for medical publishers and editors: protecting the integrity of scientific scholarship.
    Desai SS; Shortell CK
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Sep; 54(3 Suppl):59S-63S. PubMed ID: 21872119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. All the lonely people: by Caveman.
    J Cell Sci; 2004 Aug; 117(Pt 17):3705-6. PubMed ID: 15286170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers.
    Navalta JW; Lyons TS
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Dec; 34(4):170-3. PubMed ID: 21098383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.