These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15203528)

  • 1. A computerized adaptive knowledge test as an assessment tool in general practice: a pilot study.
    Roex A; Degryse J
    Med Teach; 2004 Mar; 26(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 15203528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Virtual patients for assessing medical students--important aspects when considering the introduction of a new assessment format.
    Waldmann UM; Gulich MS; Zeitler HP
    Med Teach; 2008 Feb; 30(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 18278646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations.
    Lunz ME; Bergstrom BA
    J Allied Health; 1991; 20(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 2045351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Item selection rules in a Computerized Adaptive Test for the assessment of written English].
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Ponsoda V; Abad FJ
    Psicothema; 2006 Nov; 18(4):828-34. PubMed ID: 17296125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The transition of the national certification examination from paper and pencil to computer adaptive testing.
    Zaglaniczny KL
    AANA J; 1996 Feb; 64(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8928607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Ware J
    Med Educ; 2008 Feb; 42(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 18230093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the Communication Assessment Tool.
    Makoul G; Krupat E; Chang CH
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Aug; 67(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 17574367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: validation of the CAT-5D-QOL.
    Kopec JA; Badii M; McKenna M; Lima VD; Sayre EC; Dvorak M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1384-90. PubMed ID: 18496353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education.
    De Champlain AF
    Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functioning and validity of a Computerized Adaptive Test to measure anxiety (A-CAT).
    Becker J; Fliege H; Kocalevent RD; Bjorner JB; Rose M; Walter OB; Klapp BF
    Depress Anxiety; 2008; 25(12):E182-94. PubMed ID: 18979458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations.
    Halkitis PN
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 9661734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection for postgraduate training for general practice: the role of knowledge tests.
    van Leeuwen YD; Mol SS; Pollemans MC; van der Vleuten CP; Grol R; Drop MJ
    Br J Gen Pract; 1997 Jun; 47(419):359-62. PubMed ID: 9231469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-based testing of the modified essay question: the Singapore experience.
    Lim EC; Seet RC; Oh VM; Chia BL; Aw M; Quak SH; Ong BK
    Med Teach; 2007 Nov; 29(9):e261-8. PubMed ID: 18158650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Competence in the musculoskeletal system: assessing the progression of knowledge through an undergraduate medical course.
    Basu S; Roberts C; Newble DI; Snaith M
    Med Educ; 2004 Dec; 38(12):1253-60. PubMed ID: 15566536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Progress testing with short answer questions.
    Rademakers J; Ten Cate TJ; Bär PR
    Med Teach; 2005 Nov; 27(7):578-82. PubMed ID: 16332547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Open book tests: assessment of academic learning in clerkships.
    Broyles IL; Cyr PR; Korsen N
    Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 16147801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm?
    Wagner-Menghin MM; Masters GN
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 23816590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of computerized adaptive testing in medical education.
    Huh S
    Korean J Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 21(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 25813107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computerized assessment of dental student writing skills.
    Holtzman JM; Elliot N; Biber CL; Sanders RM
    J Dent Educ; 2005 Feb; 69(2):285-95. PubMed ID: 15689614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implementing an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in dental education: effects on students' learning strategies.
    Schoonheim-Klein ME; Habets LL; Aartman IH; van der Vleuten CP; Hoogstraten J; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Nov; 10(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 17038015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.