252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15203616)
1. Vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel versus tablet in the induction of labour at term--a retrospective analysis.
Shetty A; Livingston I; Acharya S; Templeton A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 24(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 15203616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2).
Kho EM; Sadler L; McCowan L
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19032662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term.
Shetty A; Livingstone I; Acharya S; Rice P; Danielian P; Templeton A
BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15104606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Induction of labour with vaginal prostaglandin tablet vs gel.
Khan ZA; Abdul B; Majoko F
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Aug; 31(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 21823846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
Hassan AA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Obstetric outcomes after cervical ripening by multiple doses of vaginal prostaglandin E2.
Chan LY; Fu L; Leung TN; Wong SF; Lau TK
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Jan; 83(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 14678088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following additional doses of vaginal prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour: a retrospective cohort study.
Ayaz H; Black M; Madhuvrata P; Shetty A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Oct; 170(2):364-7. PubMed ID: 23932182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term.
Gregson S; Waterstone M; Norman I; Murrells T
BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 15777441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study.
Nanda S; Singhal SR; Papneja A
Trop Doct; 2007 Jan; 37(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 17326881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus spontaneous of labor in grand multiparous women.
Zamzami TY
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Dec; 273(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 16160873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Induced labor with prostaglandins: 0.5 mg PGE2 intracervical gel versus 3 mg PGE2 vaginal tablet].
Müller T; Rempen A
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1995; 199(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 7725767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of spontaneous labor with induced vaginal tablets prostaglandin E2 in grand multiparae.
Sobande AA; Al-Bar HM; Archibong EI
Saudi Med J; 2001 Aug; 22(8):698-701. PubMed ID: 11573116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multi-centre audit on the use of vaginal prostaglandin for the induction of labour.
Selo-Ojeme D; Lawal O; Nayar B;
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jul; 28(5):501-3. PubMed ID: 18850423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of prostaglandin E2 gel, prostaglandin E2 pessary and extra-amniotic saline infusion with oxytocin for induction of labour.
Qamar S; Bashir A; Ibrar F
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2012; 24(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 24397044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intravaginal prostaglandin-E2 for cervical priming and induction of labour.
Al-Taani MI
East Mediterr Health J; 2007; 13(4):855-61. PubMed ID: 17955768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
Grignaffini A; Soncini E; Anfuso S; Ronzoni E
Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
