These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15204113)

  • 1. Superconditioning from a reduced reinforcer.
    Rescorla RA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Apr; 57(2):133-52. PubMed ID: 15204113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of following an excitatory-inhibitory compound with an intermediate reinforcer.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 11987873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More rapid associative change with retraining than with initial training.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Oct; 29(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 14570514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Summation and subtraction using a modified autoshaping procedure in pigeons.
    Ploog BO
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 18396379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential role for the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in the conditioned reinforcer-induced reinstatement of extinguished cocaine seeking in rats.
    Goeders NE; Clampitt DM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 May; 161(3):222-32. PubMed ID: 12021825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spontaneous recovery of excitation but not inhibition.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):277-88. PubMed ID: 16045383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inhibition and superconditioning.
    Williams BA; McDevitt MA
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Sep; 13(5):454-9. PubMed ID: 12219813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer.
    THOMAS DR; WILLIAMS JL
    Science; 1963 Jul; 141(3576):172-3. PubMed ID: 13981055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deepened extinction from compound stimulus presentation.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Apr; 32(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 16634656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pigeons prefer conditional stimuli over their absence: a comment on Roberts et al. (2009).
    Zentall TR; Stagner JP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 20718554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A conditioned reinforcer maintained by temporal association with the termination of shock.
    Dinsmoor JA; Clayton MH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 Sep; 9(5):547-52. PubMed ID: 5964511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Associative changes in excitors and inhibitors differ when they are conditioned in compound.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2000 Oct; 26(4):428-38. PubMed ID: 11056883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of dopamine in conditioning and latent inhibition: what, when, where and how?
    Young AM; Moran PM; Joseph MH
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2005; 29(6):963-76. PubMed ID: 16045987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conditioned inhibition and superconditioning in an environment with a distinctive shape.
    Horne MR; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jul; 36(3):381-94. PubMed ID: 20658869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Does the predictive value of the conditioned reinforcer alone determine choice?
    Case JP; Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():320-326. PubMed ID: 30077654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential effects of reinforcement of an inhibitory feature after serial and simultaneous feature negative discrimination training.
    Holland PC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Oct; 10(4):461-75. PubMed ID: 6491607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An extended comparator hypothesis account of superconditioning.
    Urushihara K; Wheeler DS; Pineño O; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Apr; 31(2):184-98. PubMed ID: 15839775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aversion to the reinforcer differentially affects conditioned reinforcement and instrumental responding.
    Wilson CL; Sherman JE; Holman EW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 7241052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Species-specific response-topography of chickens' and pigeons' water-induced autoshaped responding.
    Ploog BO
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():5-11. PubMed ID: 24704490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.