These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15204120)

  • 1. Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect.
    Nuerk HC; Iversen W; Willmes K
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jul; 57(5):835-63. PubMed ID: 15204120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When is an odd number not odd? Influence of task rule on the MARC effect for numeric classification.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):832-42. PubMed ID: 17723063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation.
    Berch DB; Foley EJ; Hill RJ; Ryan PM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1999 Dec; 74(4):286-308. PubMed ID: 10552920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
    Roettger TB; Domahs F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Embodied markedness of parity? Examining handedness effects on parity judgments.
    Huber S; Klein E; Graf M; Nuerk HC; Moeller K; Willmes K
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):963-77. PubMed ID: 25394996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing access to number magnitude: a study of the SNARC effect in 7- to 9-year-olds.
    van Galen MS; Reitsma P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 Oct; 101(2):99-113. PubMed ID: 18602112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The SNARC and MARC effects measured online: Large-scale assessment methods in flexible cognitive effects.
    Cipora K; Soltanlou M; Reips UD; Nuerk HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Aug; 51(4):1676-1692. PubMed ID: 30805864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interference Between Number Magnitude and Parity.
    Krajcsi A; Lengyel G; Laczkó Á
    Exp Psychol; 2018 Mar; 65(2):71-83. PubMed ID: 29631523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect.
    Gevers W; Verguts T; Reynvoet B; Caessens B; Fias W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 16478324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and the spatial representation of magnitude.
    Bull R; Benson PJ
    Horm Behav; 2006 Aug; 50(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 16595134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. It does exist! A left-to-right spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect among native Hebrew speakers.
    Zohar-Shai B; Tzelgov J; Karni A; Rubinsten O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):719-728. PubMed ID: 28182477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What information is critical to elicit interference in number-form synaesthesia?
    Hubbard EM; Ranzini M; Piazza M; Dehaene S
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1200-16. PubMed ID: 19698941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Arbitrary numbers counter fair decisions: trails of markedness in card distribution.
    Schroeder PA; Pfister R
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():240. PubMed ID: 25852584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reveals a dissociation between SNARC and MARC effects: Implication for the polarity correspondence account.
    Di Rosa E; Bardi L; Umiltà C; Masina F; Forgione M; Mapelli D
    Cortex; 2017 Aug; 93():68-78. PubMed ID: 28623718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repetition and the SNARC effect with one- and two-digit numbers.
    Tan S; Dixon P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):84-97. PubMed ID: 21668090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Where is January? The month-SNARC effect in sequence-form synaesthetes.
    Price MC; Mentzoni RA
    Cortex; 2008; 44(7):890-907. PubMed ID: 18489968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) meets SPARC (spatial-pitch association of response codes): Automaticity and interdependency in compatibility effects.
    Weis T; Estner B; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1366-83. PubMed ID: 26274895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Backward-compatibility effects with irrelevant stimulus-response overlap: the case of the SNARC effect.
    Caessens B; Hommel B; Reynvoet B; van der Goten K
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Oct; 131(4):411-25. PubMed ID: 15523822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.