These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15204131)

  • 1. Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect.
    Taft M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 May; 57(4):745-65. PubMed ID: 15204131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age-of-acquisition effects in visual word recognition: evidence from expert vocabularies.
    Stadthagen-Gonzalez H; Bowers JS; Damian MF
    Cognition; 2004 Aug; 93(1):B11-26. PubMed ID: 15110727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is a word? Recognizing polymorphemic lexical items in DLI.
    Royle P; Jarema G; Kehayia E
    Brain Lang; 1999 Jun 1-15; 68(1-2):254-61. PubMed ID: 10433767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence for early morphological decomposition in visual word recognition.
    Solomyak O; Marantz A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Sep; 22(9):2042-57. PubMed ID: 19583463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition.
    Duñabeitia JA; Perea M; Carreiras M
    Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):691-703. PubMed ID: 17217942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is morphological decomposition limited to low-frequency words?
    McCormick SF; Brysbaert M; Rastle K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19418380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequential effects in the lexical decision task: the role of the item frequency of the previous trial.
    Perea M; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):385-401. PubMed ID: 12745840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.
    Wagenmakers EJ; Steyvers M; Raaijmakers JG; Shiffrin RM; van Rijn H; Zeelenberg R
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 May; 48(3):332-67. PubMed ID: 15020215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age of acquisition modulates the amplitude of the P300 component in spoken word recognition.
    Tainturier MJ; Tamminen J; Thierry G
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Apr; 379(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 15814191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary?
    Borowsky R; Besner D
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jan; 113(1):181-95; discussion 196-200. PubMed ID: 16478310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological-lexical competition.
    Prabhakaran R; Blumstein SE; Myers EB; Hutchison E; Britton B
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2209-21. PubMed ID: 16842827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The nature of the syllabic neighbourhood effect in French.
    Mathey S; Zagar D; Doignon N; Seigneuric A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):372-93. PubMed ID: 16620742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The development of the orthographic consistency effect in speech recognition: from sublexical to lexical involvement.
    Ventura P; Morais J; Kolinsky R
    Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):547-76. PubMed ID: 17250820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. L1 effects on the processing of inflected nouns in L2.
    Portin M; Lehtonen M; Harrer G; Wande E; Niemi J; Laine M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jul; 128(3):452-65. PubMed ID: 17719552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology.
    Gonnerman LM; Seidenberg MS; Andersen ES
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 May; 136(2):323-45. PubMed ID: 17500654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The rank hypothesis and lexical decision: a reply to Adelman and Brown (2008).
    Murray WS; Forster KI
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):240-52. PubMed ID: 18211198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling lexical decision: the form of frequency and diversity effects.
    Adelman JS; Brown GD
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):214-29. PubMed ID: 18211194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of word class proportion on cerebral asymmetries for high- and low-imagery words.
    Chiarello C; Shears C; Liu S; Kacinik NA
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Feb; 57(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15629212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.