238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15204140)
1. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects.
Vu KP; Proctor RW
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 15204140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
Proctor RW; Vu KP
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mixing location-irrelevant and location-relevant trials: influence of stimulus mode on spatial compatibility effects.
Proctor RW; Vu KP
Mem Cognit; 2002 Mar; 30(2):281-93. PubMed ID: 12035890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of bias on visuospatial and verbal compatibility effects in mixed-mapping environments.
Vu KP; Proctor RW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2594-605. PubMed ID: 21887599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Task-defined associations are mode specific for selection of relevant dimension but mode independent for selection of location mapping.
Proctor RW; Vu KP
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):370-91. PubMed ID: 18609411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influences of different combinations of conceptual, perceptual, and structural similarity on stimulus-response compatibility.
Proctor RW; Wang H; Vu KP
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 11873856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anticipatory response control in motor sequence learning: evidence from stimulus-response compatibility.
Koch I
Hum Mov Sci; 2007 Apr; 26(2):257-74. PubMed ID: 17346838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of response eccentricity and relative position on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility with joystick and keypress responses.
Proctor RW; Cho YS
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 12613566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition.
Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Notebaert W; Vandierendonck A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Nov; 120(3):307-26. PubMed ID: 15993830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment.
Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):207-22. PubMed ID: 17154770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks.
Proctor RW; Cho YS
Psychol Bull; 2006 May; 132(3):416-42. PubMed ID: 16719568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proactive and reactive control in S-R compatibility: a brain potential analysis.
Mansfield KL; van der Molen MW; van Boxtel GJ
Psychophysiology; 2012 Jun; 49(6):756-69. PubMed ID: 22524194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of response selection in sequence learning.
Deroost N; Soetens E
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Mar; 59(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 16627348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial compatibility between stimulated eye and response location.
Valle-Inclán F; Sohn F; Redondo M
Psychophysiology; 2008 Mar; 45(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 17971057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Coding specificity of orthogonal S-R compatibility].
Kleinsorge T
Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(4):249-64. PubMed ID: 10551040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reversed effects of spatial compatibility in natural scenes.
Müsseler J; Aschersleben G; Arning K; Proctor RW
Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(3):325-36. PubMed ID: 19827702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring the contributions of premotor and parietal cortex to spatial compatibility using image-guided TMS.
Koski L; Molnar-Szakacs I; Iacoboni M
Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(2):296-305. PubMed ID: 15627572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A choice reaction-time task in the rat: a new model using air-puff stimuli and lever-release responses.
Kaneko H; Tamura H; Kawashima T; Suzuki SS
Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 174(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 16934882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
