These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15204167)

  • 1. Impact of operator volume on overall major adverse cardiac events following direct coronary stent implantation versus stenting after predilatation.
    IJsselmuiden S; Kiemeneij F; Tangelder G; Slagboom T; van der Wieken R; Serruys P; Laarman G
    Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2004; 6(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 15204167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct stenting with TAXUS stents seems to be as safe and effective as with predilatation. A post hoc analysis of TAXUS II.
    Silber S; Hamburger J; Grube E; Pfisterer M; Belardi J; Webb J; Zmudka K; Nienaber C; Hauptman K; Rutsch W; Dawkins K; Drzewiecki J; Koglin J; Colombo A
    Herz; 2004 Mar; 29(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 15057438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct coronary stenting versus stenting with balloon pre-dilation: immediate and follow-up results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized study. The DISCO trial. DIrect Stenting of COronary Arteries.
    Martínez-Elbal L; Ruiz-Nodar JM; Zueco J; López-Minguez JR; Moreu J; Calvo I; Ramirez JA; Alonso M; Vazquez N; Lezaun R; Rodriguez C
    Eur Heart J; 2002 Apr; 23(8):633-40. PubMed ID: 11969278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation is feasible, safe, and more cost-effective in selected patients: evidence to date indicating similar late outcomes.
    Ijsselmuiden AJ; Tangelder GJ; Cotton JM; Vaijifdar B; Kiemeneij F; Slagboom T; v d Wieken R; Serruys PW; Laarman GJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2003; 5(3):143-50. PubMed ID: 12959731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In-hospital and late clinical outcomes of direct stenting strategy versus stenting after predilatation for the treatment of coronary artery lesions.
    Alidoosti M; Salarifar M; Kassaian SE; Zeinali AH; Dehkordi MR; Fathollahi MS
    Indian Heart J; 2008; 60(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 19242009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Drug-eluting stents in bifurcation lesions: to stent one branch or both?
    Assali AR; Assa HV; Ben-Dor I; Teplitsky I; Solodky A; Brosh D; Fuchs S; Kornowski R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Dec; 68(6):891-6. PubMed ID: 17086532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The comparison of early and late outcome of direct and conventional stenting of patients with st elevation myocardial infarction.
    Tacoy G; Yazici GE; Erden M; Timurkaynak T
    Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis; 2009 Jun; 3(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 19465441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct coronary stenting versus stenting with balloon pre-dilation: incidence of enzyme release and follow-up results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized study. The CK and Troponin I Estimation in direct STenting (CK TEST) trial.
    Balducelli M; Varani E; Vecchi G; Paloscia L; Manari A; Santarelli A; Cappi B; Shoeib A; Valenti S; Maresta A;
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2007 Jun; 55(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 17534246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct stenting compared to conventional stenting in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Angioplasty for Coronary Artery Disease (DECIDE): a multicenter, open label, randomized, controlled efficacy study.
    Tan HC; Lim YT; Rosli TL; Sim KH; Tan KH; Lee CH; Ismail O; Azman W
    Am Heart J; 2004 Dec; 148(6):1007-11. PubMed ID: 15632886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term outcomes after stenting of bifurcation lesions with the "crush" technique: predictors of an adverse outcome.
    Hoye A; Iakovou I; Ge L; van Mieghem CA; Ong AT; Cosgrave J; Sangiorgi GM; Airoldi F; Montorfano M; Michev I; Chieffo A; Carlino M; Corvaja N; Aoki J; Rodriguez Granillo GA; Valgimigli M; Sianos G; van der Giessen WJ; de Feyter PJ; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW; Colombo A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 May; 47(10):1949-58. PubMed ID: 16697310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention on proximal versus non-proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, proximal left circumflex, and proximal right coronary artery: a cross-sectional study.
    Alidoosti M; Salarifar M; Zeinali AM; Kassaian SE; Dehkordi MR
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2007 Mar; 7():7. PubMed ID: 17335586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct coronary stent implantation does not reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis or major adverse cardiac events: six month results of a randomized trial.
    IJsselmuiden AJ; Serruys PW; Scholte A; Kiemeneij F; Slagboom T; vd Wieken LR; Tangelder GJ; Laarman GJ
    Eur Heart J; 2003 Mar; 24(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 12633544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stenting alone versus debulking and debulking plus stent in branch ostial lesions of native coronary arteries.
    Chung CM; Nakamura S; Tanaka K; Tanigawa J; Kitano K; Akiyama T; Matoba Y; Katoh O
    Heart Vessels; 2004 Sep; 19(5):213-20. PubMed ID: 15372295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in patients with stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.
    Dangas G; Ellis SG; Shlofmitz R; Katz S; Fish D; Martin S; Mehran R; Russell ME; Stone GW;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Apr; 45(8):1186-92. PubMed ID: 15837247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional result following direct coronary artery stenting with drug eluting stents in chronic stable angina is similar to stenting after balloon predilatation.
    Balachandran KP; Singh B; Sandilands A; Popusoi G; Rubino P; Baumbach A
    Int J Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 128(3):374-7. PubMed ID: 17689737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coronary stenting without predilatation in a broad spectrum of clinical and angiographic situations.
    Chan AW; Carere RG; Solankhi N; Dodek A; Webb JG
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2000 Feb; 12(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 10731268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct stenting may limit myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Nageh T; Thomas MR; Sherwood RA; Harris BM; Jewitt DE; Wainwright RJ
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2003 Mar; 15(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 12612383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Latin American randomized trial of balloon angioplasty versus coronary stenting in diabetic patients with small vessel reference size (Latin American Small Vessel [LASMAL II] Trial): immediate and long-term results.
    Rodriguez AE; Rodriguez Alemparte M; Fernandez Pereira C; Vigo CF; Sampaolesi A; Bernardi V; Marchand E; Tronge J; Palacios IF;
    Am Heart J; 2005 Jul; 150(1):188. PubMed ID: 16086559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized comparison of early inflammatory response after sirolimus-eluting stent vs bare metal stent implantation in native coronary lesions.
    Li JJ; Qin XW; Yang XC; Li ZC; Zeng HS; Xu B; Gao Z; Wu YJ; Zhang X; Zhang CY
    Clin Chim Acta; 2008 Oct; 396(1-2):38-42. PubMed ID: 18634770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial.
    Stone GW; Midei M; Newman W; Sanz M; Hermiller JB; Williams J; Farhat N; Caputo R; Xenopoulos N; Applegate R; Gordon P; White RM; Sudhir K; Cutlip DE; Petersen JL;
    Circulation; 2009 Feb; 119(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 19171853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.