These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15204325)

  • 1. Neuropsychologists diagnose traumatic brain injury.
    Wade JB; DeMatteo D; Hart RP
    Brain Inj; 2004 Jul; 18(7):629-43. PubMed ID: 15204325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Traumatic brain injury and forensic neuropsychology.
    Bigler ED; Brooks M
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):76-87. PubMed ID: 19333063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuropsychologist experts and neurolaw: cases, controversies, and admissibility challenges.
    Kaufmann PM
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(6):739-55. PubMed ID: 24115139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mild traumatic brain injury: Is DTI ready for the courtroom?
    Shenton ME; Price BH; Levin L; Edersheim JG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 61():50-63. PubMed ID: 30391039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Independent and court-ordered forensic neuropsychological examinations: official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology.
    Bush SS;
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2005 Dec; 20(8):997-1007. PubMed ID: 16076547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) and expert testimony.
    Kulich R; Maciewicz R; Scrivani SJ
    Pain Med; 2009 Mar; 10(2):373-80. PubMed ID: 19254335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Best practice guidelines for forensic neuropsychological examinations of patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Ruff R
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 19333068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony.
    Merlino ML; Murray CI; Richardson JT
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 18344168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethical considerations for peer review in forensic neuropsychology.
    Johnson-Greene D; Bechtold KT
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Feb; 16(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 11992232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forensic Neuropsychology: are we there yet?
    Hom J
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Dec; 18(8):827-45. PubMed ID: 14609579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forensic neuropsychology and expert witness testimony: An overview of forensic practice.
    Leonard EL
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():177-82. PubMed ID: 26409570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who should conduct and interpret the neuropsychological assessment in sports-related concussion?
    Echemendia RJ; Herring S; Bailes J
    Br J Sports Med; 2009 May; 43 Suppl 1():i32-5. PubMed ID: 19433423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SLAM on the stand: how the sports-related concussion literature can inform the expert witness.
    Bailey CM; Barth JT; Bender SD
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 19333067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neuropsychologist Experts and Civil Capacity Evaluations: Representative Cases.
    Kaufmann PM
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2016 Sep; 31(6):487-94. PubMed ID: 27538441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Admissibility of neuropsychological testimony after Daubert and Kumho.
    Stern BH
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 11568467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. US Supreme Court decisions, expert testimony, and implant dentistry.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 12498453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inconsistency in evidentiary standards for medical testimony: disorder in the courts.
    Kassirer JP; Cecil JS
    JAMA; 2002 Sep; 288(11):1382-7. PubMed ID: 12234232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.