These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen. Obek C; Louis P; Civantos F; Soloway MS J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens. Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens. Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens. Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conventional assessment of needle biopsy specimens is more useful than digital image analysis of proliferation and DNA ploidy in prediction of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy. Sengupta S; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Zincke H; Myers RP; Riehle DL; Pankratz VS; Blute ML; Sebo TJ Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 16844452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are prostate needle biopsies predictive of the laterality of significant cancer and positive surgical margins? Frota R; Stein RJ; Turna B; Kamoi K; Lin YC; Magi-Galluzzi C; Aron M; Gill IS BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1599-603. PubMed ID: 19583724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immediate radical prostatectomy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation. Over treatment? Brausi M; Castagnetti G; Dotti A; De Luca G; Olmi R; Cesinaro AM J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):906-8; discussion 908-9. PubMed ID: 15310995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of intraoperative biopsies during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Lepor H; Kaci L Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 15028445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features. Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer based on systematic core biopsies. Tarján M; Tot T Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(6):459-64. PubMed ID: 17130097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens. Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indications for preoperative prostate biopsy in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer. Thomas C; Wiesner C; Melchior S; Gillitzer R; Schmidt F; Thüroff JW J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1938-41; discussion 1941. PubMed ID: 18801501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]