These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15204423)

  • 1. Positive apical surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy, truth or artefact?
    Connolly SS; O'Toole GC; O'Malley KJ; Manecksha R; O'Brien A; Mulvin DW; Quinlan DM
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004; 38(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15204423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
    Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of positive apical surgical margins on likelihood of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Kordan Y; Salem S; Chang SS; Clark PE; Cookson MS; Davis R; Herrell SD; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Smith JA; Barocas DA
    J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2695-701. PubMed ID: 19836759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
    Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Saad F; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
    J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):601-7; discussion 607-8. PubMed ID: 19084864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location.
    Pettus JA; Weight CJ; Thompson CJ; Middleton RG; Stephenson RA
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 15201752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic value of surgical margin status for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Hashimoto K; Masumori N; Takei F; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Itoh N; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 18203710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of intraoperative biopsies during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Lepor H; Kaci L
    Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 15028445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression.
    Aydin H; Tsuzuki T; Hernandez D; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
    Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 15351591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level significantly related to clinical recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer?
    Haukaas SA; Halvorsen OJ; Daehlin L; Hostmark J; Akslen LA
    BJU Int; 2006 Jan; 97(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 16336328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ratio of oleic-to-stearic acid in the prostate predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
    Kositsawat J; Flanigan RC; Meydani M; Choi YK; Freeman VL
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2391-6; discussion 2396. PubMed ID: 17936811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
    Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
    Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.