191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15204423)
1. Positive apical surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy, truth or artefact?
Connolly SS; O'Toole GC; O'Malley KJ; Manecksha R; O'Brien A; Mulvin DW; Quinlan DM
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004; 38(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15204423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of positive apical surgical margins on likelihood of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Kordan Y; Salem S; Chang SS; Clark PE; Cookson MS; Davis R; Herrell SD; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Smith JA; Barocas DA
J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2695-701. PubMed ID: 19836759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Saad F; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):601-7; discussion 607-8. PubMed ID: 19084864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location.
Pettus JA; Weight CJ; Thompson CJ; Middleton RG; Stephenson RA
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 15201752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of surgical margin status for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto K; Masumori N; Takei F; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Itoh N; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 18203710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of intraoperative biopsies during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Lepor H; Kaci L
Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 15028445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression.
Aydin H; Tsuzuki T; Hernandez D; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 15351591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level significantly related to clinical recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer?
Haukaas SA; Halvorsen OJ; Daehlin L; Hostmark J; Akslen LA
BJU Int; 2006 Jan; 97(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 16336328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ratio of oleic-to-stearic acid in the prostate predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
Kositsawat J; Flanigan RC; Meydani M; Choi YK; Freeman VL
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2391-6; discussion 2396. PubMed ID: 17936811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
