BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15204720)

  • 1. Ethanol and diethyl phthalate: vehicle effects in the local lymph node assay.
    Lalko J; Isola D; Api AM
    Int J Toxicol; 2004; 23(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 15204720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of the dermal sensitization potential of various essential oils in the local lymph node assay.
    Lalko J; Api AM
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 May; 44(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 16324777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of ethanol:diethylphthalate as a vehicle for the local lymph node assay.
    Betts CJ; Beresford L; Dearman RJ; Lalko J; Api AP; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17244073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
    Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of vehicles on the human dermal irritation potentials of allyl esters.
    Politano VT; Isola DA; Lalko J; Api AM
    Int J Toxicol; 2006; 25(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 16717034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
    Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
    J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fragrance compound geraniol forms contact allergens on air exposure. Identification and quantification of oxidation products and effect on skin sensitization.
    Hagvall L; Bäcktorp C; Svensson S; Nyman G; Börje A; Karlberg AT
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2007 May; 20(5):807-14. PubMed ID: 17428070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of vehicle on assessment of relative skin sensitization potency of 1,4-dihydroquinone in the local lymph node assay.
    Lea LJ; Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 10594297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde.
    Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Harvey P; Evans P; Basketter DA; Kimber I
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 9471984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
    Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
    J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
    Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of an ex vivo local lymph node assay to assess contact hypersensitivity potential.
    Piccotti JR; Kawabata TT
    J Immunotoxicol; 2008 Jul; 5(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 18830887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay.
    Dearman RJ; Betts CJ; Farr C; McLaughlin J; Berdasco N; Wiench K; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Oct; 57(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 17868217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of phthalate esters on the sensitization phase of contact hypersensitivity induced by fluorescein isothiocyanate.
    Imai Y; Kondo A; Iizuka H; Maruyama T; Kurohane K
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2006 Nov; 36(11):1462-8. PubMed ID: 17083357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reduced local lymph node assay: the impact of group size.
    Ryan CA; Chaney JG; Kern PS; Patlewicz GY; Basketter DA; Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Gerberick GF
    J Appl Toxicol; 2008 May; 28(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 17879259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The local lymph node assay and skin sensitization testing.
    Kimber I; Dearman RJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 598():221-31. PubMed ID: 19967517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potency and risk assessment of a skin-sensitizing disperse dye using the local lymph node assay.
    Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 May; 52(5):268-72. PubMed ID: 15899000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens.
    Gerberick GF; Vassallo JD; Bailey RE; Chaney JG; Morrall SW; Lepoittevin JP
    Toxicol Sci; 2004 Oct; 81(2):332-43. PubMed ID: 15254333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.
    Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
    Schneider K; Akkan Z
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.