These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15205548)

  • 1. Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Abbas PJ; Hughes ML; Brown CJ; Miller CA; South H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):203-13. PubMed ID: 15205548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.
    Botros A; Psarros C
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 20090532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users].
    Zhu X; Cao K; Pan T; Yang H; Wang Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring the refractoriness of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.
    Morsnowski A; Charasse B; Collet L; Killian M; Müller-Deile J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(6):389-402. PubMed ID: 17008774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrode interaction in pediatric cochlear implant subjects.
    Eisen MD; Franck KH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 6(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 15952052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system.
    Cafarelli Dees D; Dillier N; Lai WK; von Wallenberg E; van Dijk B; Akdas F; Aksit M; Batman C; Beynon A; Burdo S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Conway M; Coudert C; Craddock L; Cullington H; Deggouj N; Fraysse B; Grabel S; Kiefer J; Kiss JG; Lenarz T; Mair A; Maune S; Müller-Deile J; Piron JP; Razza S; Tasche C; Thai-Van H; Toth F; Truy E; Uziel A; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(2):105-16. PubMed ID: 15650302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences between electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and behavioral measures in children with cochlear implants operated in the school age vs. operated in the first years of life.
    Vlahović S; Šindija B; Aras I; Glunčić M; Trotić R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 76(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 22398117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An improved masker-probe method for stimulus artifact reduction in electrically evoked compound action potentials.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldan C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Oct; 175(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18771694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.
    Dingemanse JG; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):645-57. PubMed ID: 17086076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Garcia C; Deeks JM; Goehring T; Borsetto D; Bance M; Carlyon RP
    Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Stille LJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):679-92. PubMed ID: 20505513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.
    DeVries L; Scheperle R; Bierer JA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 17(3):237-52. PubMed ID: 26926152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
    Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children.
    Gordin A; Papsin B; James A; Gordon K
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients.
    Cohen LT; Saunders E; Richardson LM
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 43(6):346-55. PubMed ID: 15457817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.