418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15205549)
1. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability.
Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.
Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 15148187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of converting bilateral cochlear implant subjects to a strategy with increased rate and number of channels.
Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA; Gantz BJ
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2006 Jun; 115(6):425-32. PubMed ID: 16805373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.
Gifford RH; Shallop JK; Peterson AM
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 18212519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhanced hearing in noise for cochlear implant recipients: clinical trial results for a commercially available speech-enhancement strategy.
Koch DB; Quick A; Osberger MJ; Saoji A; Litvak L
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jun; 35(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 24691504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implementation of perceptual channels in children implanted with a HiRes 90K device.
Mancini P; Bosco E; D'agosta L; Traisci G; Nicastri M; Capelli G; Ballantyne D; Filipo R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 129(12):1442-50. PubMed ID: 19922095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lexical tone perception with HiResolution and HiResolution 120 sound-processing strategies in pediatric Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
Han D; Liu B; Zhou N; Chen X; Kong Y; Liu H; Zheng Y; Xu L
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 19194297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children.
Wolfe J; Schafer EC; John A; Hudson M
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21436756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120.
Brendel M; Buechner A; Krueger B; Frohne-Buechner C; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18223447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
