These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15205722)
1. An evaluation of the United Kingdom National Osteoporosis Society position statement on the use of peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Patel R; Blake GM; Fogelman I Osteoporos Int; 2004 Jun; 15(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 15205722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A list of device-specific thresholds for the clinical interpretation of peripheral x-ray absorptiometry examinations. Blake GM; Chinn DJ; Steel SA; Patel R; Panayiotou E; Thorpe J; Fordham JN; Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):2149-56. PubMed ID: 16228104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice. Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study. Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture. Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification. Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ability of peripheral DXA measurements of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density at menopause. Pouillès JM; Tremollières FA; Martinez S; Delsol M; Ribot C Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11305086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis. de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone densitometry in the management of Colles' fractures: which site to measure? Ryan PJ Br J Radiol; 2001 Dec; 74(888):1137-41. PubMed ID: 11777772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The discriminative ability of peripheral and axial bone measurements to identify proximal femoral, vertebral, distal forearm and proximal humeral fractures: a case control study. Clowes JA; Eastell R; Peel NF Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1794-802. PubMed ID: 15947861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of digital X-ray radiogrammetry and peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients attending fracture clinic after distal forearm fracture. Reed MR; Murray JR; Abdy SE; Francis RM; McCaskie AW Bone; 2004 Apr; 34(4):716-9. PubMed ID: 15050903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk. Frediani B; Acciai C; Falsetti P; Baldi F; Filippou G; Siagkri C; Spreafico A; Galeazzi M; Marcolongo R Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of fracture discrimination using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in women with a history of fracture at sites other than the spine and hip. Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Sep; 71(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 12154392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone density reduction in various measurement sites in men and women with osteoporotic fractures of spine and hip: the European quantitation of osteoporosis study. Kröger H; Lunt M; Reeve J; Dequeker J; Adams JE; Birkenhager JC; Diaz Curiel M; Felsenberg D; Hyldstrup L; Kotzki P; Laval-Jeantet A; Lips P; Louis O; Perez Cano R; Reiners C; Ribot C; Ruegsegger P; Schneider P; Braillon P; Pearson J Calcif Tissue Int; 1999 Mar; 64(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 10024374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colles' fracture of the wrist as an indicator of underlying osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a prospective study of bone mineral density and bone turnover rate. Earnshaw SA; Cawte SA; Worley A; Hosking DJ Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 9692078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX. Kälvesten J; Lui LY; Brismar T; Cummings S Bone; 2016 May; 86():30-5. PubMed ID: 26921822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound measurements is similar to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a Brazilian women population with osteoporotic fracture. Pinheiro MM; Castro CH; Frisoli A; Szejnfeld VL Calcif Tissue Int; 2003 Dec; 73(6):555-64. PubMed ID: 14517710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women. Fiter J; Nolla JM; Gómez-Vaquero C; Martínez-Aguilá D; Valverde J; Roig-Escofet D Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative assessment of bone mineral measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Formica CA; Nieves JW; Cosman F; Garrett P; Lindsay R Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(5):460-7. PubMed ID: 9850355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ability of peripheral DXA measurement to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement. Picard D; Brown JP; Rosenthall L; Couturier M; Lévesque J; Dumont M; Ste-Marie LG; Tenenhouse A; Dodin S J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 14742895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]