These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15206542)

  • 1. Conditional bias of point estimates following a group sequential test.
    Fan XF; DeMets DL; Lan KK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2004 May; 14(2):505-30. PubMed ID: 15206542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Point estimation following a two-stage group sequential trial.
    Grayling MJ; Wason JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Feb; 32(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 36384365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of conditional bias-adjusted estimators for interim analysis in clinical trials with survival data.
    Shimura M; Gosho M; Hirakawa A
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(13):2067-2080. PubMed ID: 28211076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conditional estimation using prior information in 2-stage group sequential designs assuming asymptotic normality when the trial terminated early.
    Shimura M; Maruo K; Gosho M
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):400-413. PubMed ID: 29687592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conditional bias adjusted estimator of treatment effect in 2-in-1 adaptive design.
    Bai X; Deng Q; Li W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jun; ():1-20. PubMed ID: 38841980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation After a Group Sequential Trial.
    Milanzi E; Molenberghs G; Alonso A; Kenward MG; Tsiatis AA; Davidian M; Verbeke G
    Stat Biosci; 2015 Oct; 7(2):187-205. PubMed ID: 26478751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of estimation methods adjusting for selection bias in adaptive enrichment designs with time-to-event endpoints.
    Di Stefano F; Pannaux M; Correges A; Galtier S; Robert V; Saint-Hilary G
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(10):1767-1779. PubMed ID: 35098579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conditional pairwise person parameter estimates in Rasch models.
    Kreiner S
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 23270977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of the treatment effect following a clinical trial that stopped early for benefit.
    Marschner IC; Schou M; Martin AJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Dec; 31(12):2456-2469. PubMed ID: 36065593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimators of the local false discovery rate designed for small numbers of tests.
    Padilla M; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Oct; 11(5):4. PubMed ID: 23079518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of missing data due to drop-outs on estimators for rates of change in longitudinal studies: a simulation study.
    Touloumi G; Babiker AG; Pocock SJ; Darbyshire JH
    Stat Med; 2001 Dec; 20(24):3715-28. PubMed ID: 11782028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Supplementary analysis of probabilities at the termination of a group sequential phase II trial.
    Liu A; Wu C; Yu KF; Gehan E
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1009-27. PubMed ID: 15565737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3078-94. PubMed ID: 17187347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decreased Susceptibility of Marginal Odds Ratios to Finite-sample Bias.
    Ross RK; Cole SR; Richardson DB
    Epidemiology; 2021 Sep; 32(5):648-652. PubMed ID: 34001751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple and efficient bias-reduced estimator of response probability following a group sequential phase II trial.
    Guo HY; Liu A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):773-81. PubMed ID: 16078384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of several point estimators of the odds ratio in a single 2 x 2 contingency table.
    Walter SD; Cook RJ
    Biometrics; 1991 Sep; 47(3):795-811. PubMed ID: 1742440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An additive boundary for group sequential designs with connection to conditional error.
    Xi D; Gallo P
    Stat Med; 2019 Oct; 38(23):4656-4669. PubMed ID: 31338847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The bias of the sample proportion following a group sequential phase II clinical trial.
    Chang MN; Wieand HS; Chang VT
    Stat Med; 1989 May; 8(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 2727475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying the bias in the estimated treatment effect in randomized trials having interim analyses and a rule for early stopping for futility.
    Walter SD; Han H; Briel M; Guyatt GH
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(9):1506-1518. PubMed ID: 28183155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing bias in parameter estimates from stepwise regression in proportional hazards regression with right-censored data.
    Soh CH; Harrington DP; Zaslavsky AM
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2008 Mar; 14(1):65-85. PubMed ID: 18189162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.