142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15206656)
1. Rater training in multicenter clinical trials: issues and recommendations.
Kobak KA; Engelhardt N; Williams JB; Lipsitz JD
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2004 Apr; 24(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 15206656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A new approach to rater training and certification in a multicenter clinical trial.
Kobak KA; Lipsitz JD; Williams JB; Engelhardt N; Bellew KM
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2005 Oct; 25(5):407-12. PubMed ID: 16160614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neuroscience-based Nomenclature: improving clinical and scientific terminology in research and clinical psychopharmacology.
Brühl AB; Sahakian BJ
Psychol Med; 2017 Jun; 47(8):1339-1341. PubMed ID: 28095940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel approach to rater training and certification in multinational trials.
Jeglic E; Kobak KA; Engelhardt N; Williams JB; Lipsitz JD; Salvucci D; Bryson H; Bellew K
Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2007 Jul; 22(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 17519640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of psychopharmacology on the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology examinations.
Juul D; Winstead DK; Sheiber SC
Acad Psychiatry; 2005; 29(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 15937269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. NPP (Neuropsychopharmacology): update on gender balance in journal function.
Jordan CJ; Carlezon WA
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2019 Dec; 44(13):2145-2148. PubMed ID: 31480071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ensuring reliability of clinical assessments for SLE trials.
Ramsey-Goldman R; Hayes KW
Lupus; 1999; 8(8):671-6. PubMed ID: 10568905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Data and reflection on the current process of evaluation of multicenter clinical trials in Spain].
Gil Aguado A; Lavilla Uriol P; Fernández de Uzquiano E
Rev Clin Esp; 2007 Dec; 207(11):586-7; author reply 587. PubMed ID: 18021654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The unique judgement in multicenter clinical trials: the new Spanish normative in the European frame].
Dal-Ré R
Med Clin (Barc); 2005 Feb; 124(7):263-5. PubMed ID: 15743593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does evidence from clinical trials in psychopharmacology apply in clinical practice?
Stahl SM
J Clin Psychiatry; 2001 Jan; 62(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11235934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [New regulation for multicenter clinical trials and its repercussions on the function of current clinical trial ethics committees].
García Herrera JL
Rev Esp Quimioter; 2003 Dec; 16(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 14961130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [A multicenter clinical JCOG-LSG trial, from a protocol coordinator's standpoint].
Ohmachi K
Rinsho Ketsueki; 2006 Jul; 47(7):571-8. PubMed ID: 16910565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Regulation of the evaluation process of multicentric clinical trials in Spain].
Arnau JM; Fuentes I; Laporte JR
Med Clin (Barc); 2003 Jul; 121(5):197; author reply 197. PubMed ID: 12867010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The MS Co-Operative REsearch (MS-CORE) group: an alternate approach to fostering multicenter studies.
Cohen J; Cutter G; Lublin F; Schwid S
Mult Scler; 2004 Jun; 10(3):332-3. PubMed ID: 15222702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The application of good clinical practice to challenge tests.
Bailey JE
J Psychopharmacol; 2004 Mar; 18(1):16; author reply 18-9. PubMed ID: 15107178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementing the EGASIS trial, an international multicenter acute intervention trial in stroke.
van Raak L; Hilton A; Kessels F; Lodder J
Control Clin Trials; 2002 Feb; 23(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 11852168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multicentre clinical research?
Gandevia SC; McKeown T; Wright MM; Briody GP; Watson JD
Med J Aust; 1998 Sep; 169(5):285. PubMed ID: 9762073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multicentre clinical research?
O'Brien EA; Saltman DC; Berglund CA
Med J Aust; 1998 Sep; 169(5):284-5. PubMed ID: 9762072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multicentre clinical research?
Henman MJ; Tattersall MH; Brown RF
Med J Aust; 1998 Sep; 169(5):283-4. PubMed ID: 9762071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multicentre clinical research?
Clarke CW
Med J Aust; 1998 Sep; 169(5):283. PubMed ID: 9762070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
