These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments. Yang AS; Honig B J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):691-711. PubMed ID: 10966778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of functionally conserved residues with the use of entropy-variability plots. Oliveira L; Paiva PB; Paiva AC; Vriend G Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):544-52. PubMed ID: 12910454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Thompson JD; Higgins DG; Gibson TJ Nucleic Acids Res; 1994 Nov; 22(22):4673-80. PubMed ID: 7984417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scoredist: a simple and robust protein sequence distance estimator. Sonnhammer EL; Hollich V BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():108. PubMed ID: 15857510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved pairwise alignments of proteins in the Twilight Zone using local structure predictions. Huang YM; Bystroff C Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 22(4):413-22. PubMed ID: 16352653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Amino acid substitution during functionally constrained divergent evolution of protein sequences. Benner SA; Cohen MA; Gonnet GH Protein Eng; 1994 Nov; 7(11):1323-32. PubMed ID: 7700864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PASS2: an automated database of protein alignments organised as structural superfamilies. Bhaduri A; Pugalenthi G; Sowdhamini R BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 5():35. PubMed ID: 15059245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The significant conservative and variable regions of the homologous protein sequences. Kostetsky PV; Vladimirova RR J Biomol Struct Dyn; 1992 Jun; 9(6):1061-72. PubMed ID: 1322142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. OXBench: a benchmark for evaluation of protein multiple sequence alignment accuracy. Raghava GP; Searle SM; Audley PC; Barber JD; Barton GJ BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Oct; 4():47. PubMed ID: 14552658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Henikoff S; Henikoff JG Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1992 Nov; 89(22):10915-9. PubMed ID: 1438297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Empirical analysis of protein insertions and deletions determining parameters for the correct placement of gaps in protein sequence alignments. Chang MS; Benner SA J Mol Biol; 2004 Aug; 341(2):617-31. PubMed ID: 15276848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the quality of tree-based protein classification. Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A method for detecting distant evolutionary relationships between protein or nucleic acid sequences in the presence of deletions or insertions. Elleman TC J Mol Evol; 1978 Jun; 11(2):143-61. PubMed ID: 671562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new approach for displaying identities and differences among aligned amino acid sequences. Friemann A; Schmitz S Comput Appl Biosci; 1992 Jun; 8(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 1633568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of structure-based sequence alignment of automatic methods. Kim C; Lee B BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():355. PubMed ID: 17883866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Castresana J Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Apr; 17(4):540-52. PubMed ID: 10742046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]