820 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15207508)
1. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale.
Salaffi F; Stancati A; Silvestri CA; Ciapetti A; Grassi W
Eur J Pain; 2004 Aug; 8(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 15207508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale.
Farrar JT; Young JP; LaMoreaux L; Werth JL; Poole MR
Pain; 2001 Nov; 94(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 11690728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimum clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state in pain and function in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, chronic back pain, hand osteoarthritis, and hip and knee osteoarthritis: Results from a prospective multinational study.
Tubach F; Ravaud P; Martin-Mola E; Awada H; Bellamy N; Bombardier C; Felson DT; Hajjaj-Hassouni N; Hochberg M; Logeart I; Matucci-Cerinic M; van de Laar M; van der Heijde D; Dougados M
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2012 Nov; 64(11):1699-707. PubMed ID: 22674853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of clinically important change for visual analog scales measuring chronic temporomandibular disorder pain.
Emshoff R; Emshoff I; Bertram S
J Orofac Pain; 2010; 24(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 20664827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Brief pain inventory--facial minimum clinically important difference.
Sandhu SK; Halpern CH; Vakhshori V; Mirsaeedi-Farahani K; Farrar JT; Lee JY
J Neurosurg; 2015 Jan; 122(1):180-90. PubMed ID: 25361481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Relevance of Changes in Pain Intensity in Patients with Specific Back Pain.
Haase I; Kladny B
Z Orthop Unfall; 2022 Apr; 160(2):213-221. PubMed ID: 33461231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome measures in chronic low back pain.
Maughan EF; Lewis JS
Eur Spine J; 2010 Sep; 19(9):1484-94. PubMed ID: 20397032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinically significant changes in pain along the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale in patients with chronic low back pain.
Suzuki H; Aono S; Inoue S; Imajo Y; Nishida N; Funaba M; Harada H; Mori A; Matsumoto M; Higuchi F; Nakagawa S; Tahara S; Ikeda S; Izumi H; Taguchi T; Ushida T; Sakai T
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229228. PubMed ID: 32126108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical important improvement of chronic pain patients in randomized controlled trials and the DATAPAIN cohort.
Waardenburg S; de Meij N; Brouwer B; Van Zundert J; van Kuijk SMJ
Pain Pract; 2022 Mar; 22(3):349-358. PubMed ID: 34775674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments.
Sorensen AA; Howard D; Tan WH; Ketchersid J; Calfee RP
J Hand Surg Am; 2013 Apr; 38(4):641-9. PubMed ID: 23481405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring clinically relevant improvement after lumbar spine surgery: is it time for something new?
Asher AM; Oleisky ER; Pennings JS; Khan I; Sivaganesan A; Devin CJ; Bydon M; Asher AL; Archer KR
Spine J; 2020 Jun; 20(6):847-856. PubMed ID: 32001385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Assessment of Clinically Important Differences on the Worst Pain Severity Item of the Modified Brief Pain Inventory in Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.
Marcus J; Lasch K; Wan Y; Yang M; Hsu C; Merante D
Pain Res Manag; 2018; 2018():2140420. PubMed ID: 30140328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Patient-Reported Outcomes After TKA Depend on Central Sensitization.
Kim MS; Koh IJ; Choi KY; Seo JY; In Y
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Aug; 103(15):1374-1382. PubMed ID: 34014863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.
Rojanasopondist P; Galea VP; Connelly JW; Matuszak SJ; Rolfson O; Bragdon CR; Malchau H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1301-1312. PubMed ID: 31136425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients.
Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Manniche C; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Oct; 7():82. PubMed ID: 17064410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical importance of changes in the 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for worst, least, and average pain intensity: analyses of data from clinical trials of duloxetine in pain disorders.
Farrar JT; Pritchett YL; Robinson M; Prakash A; Chappell A
J Pain; 2010 Feb; 11(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 19665938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Anderson PA
Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
