148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15207596)
1. The use of micro-algal biomass as a carbon source for biological sulphate reducing systems.
Boshoff G; Duncan J; Rose PD
Water Res; 2004 Jun; 38(11):2659-66. PubMed ID: 15207596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tannery effluent as a carbon source for biological sulphate reduction.
Boshoff G; Duncan J; Rose PD
Water Res; 2004 Jun; 38(11):2651-8. PubMed ID: 15207595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microbial sulphate reduction during anaerobic digestion: EGSB process performance and potential for nitrite suppression of SRB activity.
O'Reilly C; Colleran E
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):371-6. PubMed ID: 16180452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anaerobic treatment of landfill leachate by sulfate reduction.
Henry JG; Prasad D
Water Sci Technol; 2000; 41(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 11381997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhanced sulfate reduction with acidogenic sulfate-reducing bacteria.
Wang A; Ren N; Wang X; Lee D
J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jun; 154(1-3):1060-5. PubMed ID: 18093734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of influent COD/SO4(2-) ratios on mesophilic anaerobic reactor biomass populations: physico-chemical and microbiological properties.
O'Reilly C; Colleran E
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2006 Apr; 56(1):141-53. PubMed ID: 16542412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Removal of sulphate, COD and Cr(VI) in simulated and real wastewater by sulphate reducing bacteria enrichment in small bioreactor and FTIR study.
Singh R; Kumar A; Kirrolia A; Kumar R; Yadav N; Bishnoi NR; Lohchab RK
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):677-82. PubMed ID: 20884204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of substrate concentrations on the growth of heterotrophic bacteria and algae in secondary facultative ponds.
Kayombo S; Mbwette TS; Katima JH; Jorgensen SE
Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2937-43. PubMed ID: 12767296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Activity of sulphate reducing bacteria according to COD/SO4(2-) ratio of acrylonitrile wastewater containing high sulphate.
Byun IG; Lee TH; Kim YO; Song SK; Park TJ
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):229-35. PubMed ID: 15137428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AnSBBR applied to organic matter and sulfate removal: interaction effect between feed strategy and COD/sulfate ratio.
Friedl GF; Mockaitis G; Rodrigues JA; Ratusznei SM; Zaiat M; Foresti E
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2009 Oct; 159(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 19277484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biological treatment of highly contaminated acid mine drainage in batch reactors: Long-term treatment and reactive mixture characterization.
Neculita CM; Zagury GJ
J Hazard Mater; 2008 Sep; 157(2-3):358-66. PubMed ID: 18281152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of an anaerobic bioreactor with biomass recycling, continuously removing COD and sulphate from industrial wastes.
Kosińska K; Miśkiewicz T
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jan; 100(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 18650086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anaerobic treatment of Hong Kong leachate followed by chemical oxidation.
Fang HH; Lau IW; Wang P
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):41-9. PubMed ID: 16459775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of enhanced sulphidogenesis process for the treatment of wastewater having low COD/SO(4)(2-) ratio.
Sabumon PC
J Hazard Mater; 2008 Nov; 159(2-3):616-25. PubMed ID: 18400386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of ethanol on sulfate reduction and methanogenesis].
Wang Q; Liu B; Yan DD; Li S; Chen ZZ
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 30(3):924-9. PubMed ID: 19432352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of feed time and sulfate load on the organic and sulfate removal in an ASBR.
Mockaitis G; Friedl GF; Rodrigues JA; Ratusznei SM; Zaiat M; Foresti E
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Sep; 101(17):6642-50. PubMed ID: 20392632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Competitive reaction kinetics of sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic bacteria in anaerobic filters.
Chou HH; Huang JS; Chen WG; Ohara R
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Nov; 99(17):8061-7. PubMed ID: 18448334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of feed COD/sulfate ratio as a control criterion for the biological hydrogen sulfide production and lead precipitation.
Velasco A; Ramírez M; Volke-Sepúlveda T; González-Sánchez A; Revah S
J Hazard Mater; 2008 Mar; 151(2-3):407-13. PubMed ID: 17640800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of bacteria involved in the biological sulfur cycle for paper mill effluent purification.
Janssen AJ; Lens PN; Stams AJ; Plugge CM; Sorokin DY; Muyzer G; Dijkman H; Van Zessen E; Luimes P; Buisman CJ
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Feb; 407(4):1333-43. PubMed ID: 19027933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Heterotrophic activity compromises autotrophic nitrogen removal in membrane-aerated biofilms: results of a modeling study.
Lackner S; Terada A; Smets BF
Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):1102-12. PubMed ID: 17915280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
