148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15207596)
21. Effect of COD/SO(4)(2-) ratio and sulfide on thermophilic (55 degrees C) sulfate reduction during the acidification of sucrose at pH 6.
Lopes SI; Wang X; Capela MI; Lens PN
Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(11):2379-92. PubMed ID: 17434203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Efficient nutrient removal from swine manure in a tubular biofilm photo-bioreactor using algae-bacteria consortia.
González C; Marciniak J; Villaverde S; León C; García PA; Muñoz R
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 18653942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of pentachlorophenol and chemical oxygen demand mass concentrations in influent on operational behaviors of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor.
Shen DS; He R; Liu XW; Long Y
J Hazard Mater; 2006 Aug; 136(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 16513261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Microbial conversion of sulfur dioxide in flue gas to sulfide using bulk drug industry wastewater as an organic source by mixed cultures of sulfate reducing bacteria.
Rao AG; Ravichandra P; Joseph J; Jetty A; Sarma PN
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Aug; 147(3):718-25. PubMed ID: 17324510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hydrodynamics and mathematical modelling in a low HRT inverse fluidized-bed reactor for biological sulphate reduction.
Reyes-Alvarado LC; Hatzikioseyian A; Rene ER; Houbron E; Rustrian E; Esposito G; Lens PNL
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2018 Dec; 41(12):1869-1882. PubMed ID: 30269218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Characterization and reactivity assessment of organic substrates for sulphate-reducing bacteria in acid mine drainage treatment.
Zagury GJ; Kulnieks VI; Neculita CM
Chemosphere; 2006 Aug; 64(6):944-54. PubMed ID: 16487566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Wine wastes as carbon source for biological treatment of acid mine drainage.
Costa MC; Santos ES; Barros RJ; Pires C; Martins M
Chemosphere; 2009 May; 75(6):831-6. PubMed ID: 19201010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biological inverse fluidized-bed reactors for the treatment of low pH- and sulphate-containing wastewaters under different COD/SO4(2-) conditions.
Papirio S; Esposito G; Pirozzi F
Environ Technol; 2013; 34(9-12):1141-9. PubMed ID: 24191446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Stimulation of microbial sulphate reduction in a constructed wetland: microbiological and geochemical analysis.
Lloyd JR; Klessa DA; Parry DL; Buck P; Brown NL
Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(7):1822-30. PubMed ID: 15026237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The removal of uranium from mining waste water using algal/microbial biomass.
Kalin M; Wheeler WN; Meinrath G
J Environ Radioact; 2005; 78(2):151-77. PubMed ID: 15511557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of feed characteristics on the organic matter, nitrogen and phosphorus removal in an activated sludge system treating piggery slurry.
González C; García PA; Muñoz R
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(8):2145-52. PubMed ID: 19844061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of molybdate on methanogenic and sulfidogenic activity of biomass.
Patidar SK; Tare V
Bioresour Technol; 2005 Jul; 96(11):1215-22. PubMed ID: 15734307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of nutrients on biomass evolution in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor degrading sulfate-laden organics.
Patidar SK; Tare V
Water Environ Res; 2004; 76(7):2620-7. PubMed ID: 16042109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assimilation of methane and inorganic carbon by microbial communities mediating the anaerobic oxidation of methane.
Wegener G; Niemann H; Elvert M; Hinrichs KU; Boetius A
Environ Microbiol; 2008 Sep; 10(9):2287-98. PubMed ID: 18498367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Statistical modeling and optimization of biomass granulation and COD removal in UASB reactors treating low strength wastewaters.
Bhunia P; Ghangrekar MM
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):4229-38. PubMed ID: 17936620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biological pre-treatment of wastewater containing sulfate using anaerobic immobilized cells.
Kuo WC; Shu TY
J Hazard Mater; 2004 Sep; 113(1-3):147-55. PubMed ID: 15363525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of support materials for the immobilization of sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea.
Silva AJ; Hirasawa JS; Varesche MB; Foresti E; Zaiat M
Anaerobe; 2006 Apr; 12(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 16701621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Simultaneous biological removal of nitrogen, carbon and sulfur by denitrification.
Reyes-Avila J; Razo-Flores E; Gomez J
Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3313-21. PubMed ID: 15276748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Microbial diversity and dynamics in multi- and single-compartment anaerobic bioreactors processing sulfate-rich waste streams.
Briones AM; Daugherty BJ; Angenent LT; Rausch KD; Tumbleson ME; Raskin L
Environ Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 9(1):93-106. PubMed ID: 17227415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Seasonal influence on sulfate reduction and zinc sequestration in subsurface treatment wetlands.
Stein OR; Borden-Stewart DJ; Hook PB; Jones WL
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(15):3440-8. PubMed ID: 17599383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
