These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15208012)

  • 1. The efficiency of depth discrimination for non-transparent and transparent stereoscopic surfaces.
    Wallace JM; Mamassian P
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(19):2253-67. PubMed ID: 15208012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stereopsis and aging.
    Norman JF; Norman HF; Craft AE; Walton CL; Bartholomew AN; Burton CL; Wiesemann EY; Crabtree CE
    Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(23-24):2456-65. PubMed ID: 18771680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pushing the limits of transparent-motion detection with binocular disparity.
    Greenwood JA; Edwards M
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2615-24. PubMed ID: 16530242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Latent stereopsis for motion in depth in strabismic amblyopia.
    Hess RF; Mansouri B; Thompson B; Gheorghiu E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):5006-16. PubMed ID: 19458340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pooling signals from vertically and non-vertically orientation-tuned disparity mechanisms in human stereopsis.
    Patel SS; Bedell HE; Sampat P
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 16129469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective biasing of stereo correspondence in an ambiguous stereogram.
    Goutcher R; Mamassian P
    Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 15610751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stereoscopic transparency: constraints on the perception of multiple surfaces.
    Tsirlin I; Allison RS; Wilcox LM
    J Vis; 2008 May; 8(5):5.1-10. PubMed ID: 18842076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of binocular stereopsis in monoptic depth perception.
    Wilcox LM; Harris JM; McKee SP
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2367-77. PubMed ID: 17651780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apparent position in depth of stationary moving three-dimensional objects.
    Tsui SY; Khuu SK; Hayes A
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 17069871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis.
    Grove PM; Brooks KR; Anderson BL; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1695-705; discussion 1706. PubMed ID: 16009392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis.
    Chen CC; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2691-702. PubMed ID: 16580041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dichoptic motion perception limited to depth of fixation?
    Lages M; Dolia A; Graf EW
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 17112562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stereoscopic depth discrimination with contrast windowed stimuli.
    Buckthought A; Stelmach LB
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3090-7. PubMed ID: 16765407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An integrative model of binocular vision: a stereo model utilizing interocularly unpaired points produces both depth and binocular rivalry.
    Hayashi R; Maeda T; Shimojo S; Tachi S
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(20):2367-80. PubMed ID: 15246753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stereo channels with different temporal frequency tunings.
    Lee S; Shioiri S; Yaguchi H
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 17184805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal dynamics of stereo correspondence bi-stability.
    Goutcher R; Mamassian P
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3575-85. PubMed ID: 16879853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-stereoscopic cues in the Random-Dot E stereotest: results for adult observers.
    Fricke T; Siderov J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Mar; 17(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 9196674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new look at binocular stereopsis.
    Pizlo Z; Li Y; Francis G
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2244-55. PubMed ID: 15924939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stereo dynamics are not scale-dependent.
    Hess RF; Wilcox LM
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1911-23. PubMed ID: 16469355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.