These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15209183)

  • 1. Comparing short form and RAND physical and mental health summary scores: results from total hip arthroplasty and high-risk primary-care patients.
    Blanchard CM; Côté I; Feeny D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2004; 20(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 15209183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cohort study found the RAND-12 and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 demonstrated construct validity in high-risk primary care patients.
    Feeny D; Farris K; Côté I; Johnson JA; Tsuyuki RT; Eng K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 58(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 15680746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients.
    Feeny D; Wu L; Eng K
    Qual Life Res; 2004 Dec; 13(10):1659-70. PubMed ID: 15651537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beware of the origin of numbers: Standard scoring of the SF-12 and SF-36 summary measures distorts measurement and score interpretations.
    Hagell P; Westergren A; Årestedt K
    Res Nurs Health; 2017 Aug; 40(4):378-386. PubMed ID: 28732149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do differences in methods for constructing SF-36 physical and mental health summary measures change their associations with chronic medical conditions and utilization?
    Cunningham WE; Nakazono TT; Tsai KL; Hays RD
    Qual Life Res; 2003 Dec; 12(8):1029-35. PubMed ID: 14651420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consequences of using SF-12 and RAND-12 when examining levels of well-being and psychological distress.
    Lee A; Browne MO; Villanueva E
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2008 Apr; 42(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 18330774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring physical and mental health using the SF-12: implications for community surveys of mental health.
    Windsor TD; Rodgers B; Butterworth P; Anstey KJ; Jorm AF
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2006 Sep; 40(9):797-803. PubMed ID: 16911756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the Health Utilities Index responsive in total hip arthroplasty patients?
    Blanchard C; Feeny D; Mahon JL; Bourne R; Rorabeck C; Stitt L; Webster-Bogaert S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Nov; 56(11):1046-54. PubMed ID: 14614995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of the SF-36, SF-12, and RAND-36 summary scales in a multiple sclerosis population.
    Nortvedt MW; Riise T; Myhr KM; Nyland HI
    Med Care; 2000 Oct; 38(10):1022-8. PubMed ID: 11021675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Misinterpretation with norm-based scoring of health status in adults with type 1 diabetes.
    Supina AL; Feeny DH; Carroll LJ; Johnson JA
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Mar; 4():15. PubMed ID: 16542446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Comparison of a traditional disease-specific and a quality-of-life measurement of outcome.
    Lieberman JR; Dorey F; Shekelle P; Schumacher L; Kilgus DJ; Thomas BJ; Finerman GA
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Sep; 12(6):639-45. PubMed ID: 9306214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and testing of the UK SF-12 (short form health survey).
    Jenkinson C; Layte R
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 1997 Jan; 2(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 10180648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in 1‑year outcome after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty : A cohort study in older patients with osteoarthritis.
    Zhai H; Geng H; Bai B; Wang Y
    Orthopade; 2019 Feb; 48(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 30264214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mapping the SF-12 to the HUI3 and VAS in a managed care population.
    Sengupta N; Nichol MB; Wu J; Globe D
    Med Care; 2004 Sep; 42(9):927-37. PubMed ID: 15319619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study of the construct validity of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) in patients with schizophrenia.
    Luo N; Seng BK; Thumboo J; Feeny D; Li SC
    Qual Life Res; 2006 Jun; 15(5):889-98. PubMed ID: 16721648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, V.I.
    Farivar SS; Cunningham WE; Hays RD
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2007 Sep; 5():54. PubMed ID: 17825096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.
    Gandek B; Ware JE; Aaronson NK; Apolone G; Bjorner JB; Brazier JE; Bullinger M; Kaasa S; Leplege A; Prieto L; Sullivan M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):1171-8. PubMed ID: 9817135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of the RAND-12 and SF-12 summary scores in type 2 diabetes.
    Johnson JA; Maddigan SL
    Qual Life Res; 2004 Mar; 13(2):449-56. PubMed ID: 15085917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. John Charnley Award: Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Function After THA.
    Berliner JL; Brodke DJ; Chan V; SooHoo NF; Bozic KJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):321-9. PubMed ID: 26201420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing community-preference-based and direct standard gamble utility scores: evidence from elective total hip arthroplasty.
    Feeny D; Blanchard C; Mahon JL; Bourne R; Rorabeck C; Stitt L; Webster-Bogaert S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2003; 19(2):362-72. PubMed ID: 12862193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.