112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1520923)
1. Composite-resin materials and techniques in dentistry.
Powell LV
Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Mar; 2():128-36. PubMed ID: 1520923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations.
Wilson EG; Mandradjieff M; Brindock T
Dent Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 34(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 2403943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro study of microleakage of occlusal composite restorations polymerized by a conventional curing light and a PAC curing light.
Stritikus J; Owens B
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 11314147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new copolymerized composite resin system: a multiphased evaluation.
Suzuki S; Cox CF; Leinfelder KF; Snuggs HM; Powell CS
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Oct; 15(5):482-95. PubMed ID: 9601248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: considerations on finishing/polishing. Clinical procedures.
Ferreira Rde S; Lopes GC; Baratieri LN
Quintessence Int; 2004 May; 35(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 15130074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Studies on posterior composite resins with special reference to class II restorations.
Lundin SA
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 73():1-41. PubMed ID: 2264013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of lining techniques on the marginal seal of Class II composite resin restorations.
Blixt M; Coli P
Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 8511279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Composite resins in the 21st century.
Willems G; Lambrechts P; Braem M; Vanherle G
Quintessence Int; 1993 Sep; 24(9):641-58. PubMed ID: 8272502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of Class V composite resin restorations.
Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Chinelatti MA; Dibb RG; Mondelli J
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):448-53. PubMed ID: 11203855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations.
Prakki A; Cilli R; Saad JO; Rodrigues JR
Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):785-9. PubMed ID: 15553286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Class II composite resin restorations: a three-year clinical study of six different posterior composites.
Lundin SA; Andersson B; Koch G; Rasmusson CG
Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(3):105-14. PubMed ID: 2255989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations.
Hoelscher DC; Gregory WA; Linger JB; Pink FE
Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ER-YAG laser pretreatment effect on in vitro secondary caries formation around composite restorations.
Ceballos L; Toledano M; Osorio R; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C; Hicks J
Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 11806480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
