These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15209321)

  • 1. Improving accuracy of veracity judgment through cue training.
    Santarcangelo M; Cribbie RA; Hubbard AS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Jun; 98(3 Pt 1):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15209321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Listening, not watching: situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception.
    Reinhard MA; Sporer SL; Scharmach M; Marksteiner T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 21707196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of affective states on the process of lie detection.
    Reinhard MA; Schwarz N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 23148455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Judging veracity impairs eyewitnesses' memory of a perpetrator.
    Pickel KL; Kulig TC; Bauer HM
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):843-56. PubMed ID: 23350799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Arabic within culture forensic interviews: Arabic native speaking lay-observer truth and lie accuracy, confidence, and verbal cue selection.
    Dando CJ; Sandham AL; Sibbons C; Taylor PJ
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0310384. PubMed ID: 39312557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deception detection from written accounts.
    Masip J; Bethencourt M; Lucas G; Sánchez-San Segundo M; Herrero C
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Apr; 53(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 22221194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Veracity judgement, not accuracy: Reconsidering the role of facial expressions, empathy, and emotion recognition training on deception detection.
    Zloteanu M; Bull P; Krumhuber EG; Richardson DC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 May; 74(5):910-927. PubMed ID: 33234008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
    Bond CF; Depaulo BM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guidance to detect deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales: are verbal content cues useful to detect false accusations?
    Sporer SL; Masip J; Cramer M
    Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 24720096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is It the Judge, the Sender, or Just the Individual Message? Disentangling Person and Message Effects on Variation in Lie-Detection Judgments.
    Volz S; Reinhard MA; Müller P
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2023 Nov; 18(6):1368-1387. PubMed ID: 36791692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy in deceptive vocal exaggeration of human body size.
    Pisanski K; Reby D
    Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):968. PubMed ID: 33579910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The focal account: Indirect lie detection need not access unconscious, implicit knowledge.
    Street CN; Richardson DC
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Dec; 21(4):342-55. PubMed ID: 26301728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated.
    Luke TJ
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 Jul; 14(4):646-671. PubMed ID: 31173537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The accuracy of auditors' and layered voice Analysis (LVA) operators' judgments of truth and deception during police questioning.
    Horvath F; McCloughan J; Weatherman D; Slowik S
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 23406506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. I see what you're saying: voice signals influence children's judgments of direct and averted gaze.
    Vida MD; Maurer D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Nov; 116(3):609-24. PubMed ID: 23994462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting deception in facial expressions of pain: accuracy and training.
    Hill ML; Craig KD
    Clin J Pain; 2004; 20(6):415-22. PubMed ID: 15502685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
    Hartwig M; Bond CF
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining police officers' response bias in judging veracity.
    Masip J; Herrero C
    Psicothema; 2017 Nov; 29(4):490-495. PubMed ID: 29048308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.