These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Microleakage of computer-generated Vita Cerec and Vitadur-N laminate veneers. Eskander ME; Shehab GI Egypt Dent J; 1994 Jan; 40(1):593-600. PubMed ID: 9588142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. Sadowsky SJ J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):433-42. PubMed ID: 17174661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic. Donovan TE; Chee WW Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ceramics as biomaterials for dental restoration. Höland W; Schweiger M; Watzke R; Peschke A; Kappert H Expert Rev Med Devices; 2008 Nov; 5(6):729-45. PubMed ID: 19025349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro. Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utilization of ceromer inlays/onlays for replacement of amalgam restorations. Koczarski MJ Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 May; 10(4):405-12; quiz 414. PubMed ID: 9655047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The repair methods for fractured metal-porcelain restorations: a review of the literature. Yanikoglu N Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Dec; 12(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 15691189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of framework design on fracture strength of mandibular anterior all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Koutayas SO; Kern M; Ferraresso F; Strub JR Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 12066484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays. Shortall AC; Baylis RL; Baylis MA; Grundy JR Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 2699418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The current status of etched porcelain veneer restorations. Calamia JR J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1996; 47(4):35-41. PubMed ID: 9462055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CEREC(R) CAD-CAM ceramic restorations. A case report after 5 years in place. Mormann WH; Curilović Z Acta Stomatol Croat; 1991; 25(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 1819925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reducing the failure potential of ceramic-based restorations. Part 2: Ceramic inlays, crowns, veneers, and bridges. Anusavice KJ Gen Dent; 1997; 45(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9171476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Current developments in esthetic dentistry. Nathanson D Curr Opin Dent; 1991 Apr; 1(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 1777667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A conservative, aesthetic, restorative treatment of a worn dentition. Jackson RD W V Dent J; 1994 Jul; 68(3):13-8. PubMed ID: 9518856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]