146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15209930)
1. Quantification of variability and uncertainty using mixture distributions: evaluation of sample size, mixing weights, and separation between components.
Zheng J; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Jun; 24(3):553-71. PubMed ID: 15209930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative analysis of variability and uncertainty with known measurement error: methodology and case study.
Zheng J; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2005 Jun; 25(3):663-75. PubMed ID: 16022698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Different methodologies to quantify uncertainties of air emissions.
Romano D; Bernetti A; De Lauretis R
Environ Int; 2004 Oct; 30(8):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15337355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of two-component mixtures of lognormal distributions in grouped, doubly truncated data: analysis of red blood cell volume distributions.
McLaren CE; Wagstaff M; Brittenham GM; Jacobs A
Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):607-22. PubMed ID: 1912264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Handling of contamination variability in exposure assessment: a case study with ochratoxin A.
Counil E; Verger P; Volatier JL
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Oct; 43(10):1541-55. PubMed ID: 15963619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.
Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2401-28. PubMed ID: 16015676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Particle and microorganism enumeration data: enabling quantitative rigor and judicious interpretation.
Emelko MB; Schmidt PJ; Reilly PM
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1720-7. PubMed ID: 20121082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A random sampling approach for robust estimation of tissue-to-plasma ratio from extremely sparse data.
Chu HM; Ette EI
AAPS J; 2005 Sep; 7(1):E249-58. PubMed ID: 16146346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models.
Moore JW; Semmens BX
Ecol Lett; 2008 May; 11(5):470-80. PubMed ID: 18294213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Including source uncertainty and prior information in the analysis of stable isotope mixing models.
Ward EJ; Semmens BX; Schindler DE
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(12):4645-50. PubMed ID: 20496928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes.
Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robustness of a parametric model for informatively censored bivariate longitudinal data under misspecification of its distributional assumptions: A simulation study.
Pantazis N; Touloumi G
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5473-85. PubMed ID: 18058854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the influence of setup uncertainties on treatment planning for focal liver tumors.
Balter JM; Brock KK; Lam KL; Tatro D; Dawson LA; McShan DL; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):610-4. PubMed ID: 16095848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uncertainty in allometric exponent estimation: a case study in scaling metabolic rate with body mass.
Hui D; Jackson RB
J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(1):168-77. PubMed ID: 17720203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical distributions of uncertainty and variability in activated sludge model parameters.
Cox CD
Water Environ Res; 2004; 76(7):2672-85. PubMed ID: 16042115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Context-specific independence mixture modeling for positional weight matrices.
Georgi B; Schliep A
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e166-73. PubMed ID: 16873468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of the mixing proportion in a mixture of two normal distributions from simple, rapid measurements.
James IR
Biometrics; 1978 Jun; 34(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 667273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A meta-analysis of asbestos-related cancer risk that addresses fiber size and mineral type.
Berman DW; Crump KS
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2008; 38 Suppl 1():49-73. PubMed ID: 18686078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
