344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15211478)
1. Diagnostic classification of urothelial cells in urine cytology specimens using exclusively spectral information.
Jaganath R; Angeletti C; Levenson R; Rimm DL
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 15211478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cytologic diagnosis of low-grade papillary urothelial neoplasms (low malignant potential and low-grade carcinoma) in the context of the 1998 WHO/ISUP classification.
Whisnant RE; Bastacky SI; Ohori NP
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):186-90. PubMed ID: 12672093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of malignancy in cytology specimens using spectral-spatial analysis.
Angeletti C; Harvey NR; Khomitch V; Fischer AH; Levenson RM; Rimm DL
Lab Invest; 2005 Dec; 85(12):1555-64. PubMed ID: 16200074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of the current World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathologists bladder neoplasm classification system on urine cytology results.
Curry JL; Wojcik EM
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 12115301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization as an ancillary tool to urine cytology in diagnosing urothelial carcinoma.
Veeramachaneni R; Nordberg ML; Shi R; Herrera GA; Turbat-Herrera EA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jun; 28(6):301-7. PubMed ID: 12768634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Numerical aberrations of chromosomes 11 and 17 detected by fish--fluorescence in situ hybridization combined with cytology in exfoliated cells from voided urine in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder].
Asali MG; Kaneti J; Manor E
Harefuah; 2007 Dec; 146(12):914-9, 1000. PubMed ID: 18254439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined morphologic and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of voided urine samples for the detection and follow-up of bladder cancer in patients with benign urine cytology.
Daniely M; Rona R; Kaplan T; Olsfanger S; Elboim L; Freiberger A; Lew S; Leibovitch I
Cancer; 2007 Dec; 111(6):517-24. PubMed ID: 17963263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression on urothelial and inflammatory cells of cystoscopic biopsies and urine cytology as a possible predictive marker for bladder carcinoma.
Moussa M; Omran Z; Nosseir M; Lotfy A; Swellam T
APMIS; 2009 Jan; 117(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 19161536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of ImmunoCyt, UroVysion, and urine cytology in detection of recurrent urothelial carcinoma: a "split-sample" study.
Sullivan PS; Nooraie F; Sanchez H; Hirschowitz S; Levin M; Rao PN; Rao J
Cancer; 2009 Jun; 117(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 19365828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Polyoma virus-associated cellular changes in the urine and bladder biopsy samples: a cytohistologic correlation.
Herawi M; Parwani AV; Chan T; Ali SZ; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Mar; 30(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16538054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An objective morphologic parameter to aid in the diagnosis of flat urothelial carcinoma in situ.
Milord RA; Lecksell K; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Sep; 32(9):997-1002. PubMed ID: 11567231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cytologic features of the nested variant of urothelial carcinoma: a study of seven cases.
Cardillo M; Reuter VE; Lin O
Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12589642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic cytologic sample profiles in patients with bladder cancer using TICAS system.
Koss LG; Bartels PH; Sychra JJ; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(5):392-7. PubMed ID: 364909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Possibilities and departure points for quantitative cytologic evaluation of urothelial cells for cancer diagnosis using microscopic procedures and digital image processing].
Kolle P; Aeikens B
Urologe A; 1985 Nov; 24(6):301-4. PubMed ID: 4090124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Urinary calreticulin in the diagnosis of bladder urothelial carcinoma.
Kageyama S; Isono T; Matsuda S; Ushio Y; Satomura S; Terai A; Arai Y; Kawakita M; Okada Y; Yoshiki T
Int J Urol; 2009 May; 16(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 19389084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is urinary tract cytology still useful for diagnosis of bladder carcinomas? A large series of 592 bladder washings using a five-category classification of different cytological diagnoses.
Garbar C; Mascaux C; Wespes E
Cytopathology; 2007 Apr; 18(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 17397491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer discrimination between benign and malignant urothelial cells.
Koss LG; Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Freed SZ; Taylor J; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1975; 19(4):378-91. PubMed ID: 1099854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytological significance of abnormal squamous cells in urinary cytology.
Hattori M; Nishimura Y; Toyonaga M; Kakinuma H; Matsumoto K; Ohbu M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Sep; 40(9):798-803. PubMed ID: 21309015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immunocyt and the HA-HAase urine tests for the detection of bladder cancer: a side-by-side comparison.
Hautmann S; Toma M; Lorenzo Gomez MF; Friedrich MG; Jaekel T; Michl U; Schroeder GL; Huland H; Juenemann KP; Lokeshwar VB
Eur Urol; 2004 Oct; 46(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 15363562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic significance of 'atypia' in instrumented versus voided urine specimens.
Kapur U; Venkataraman G; Wojcik EM
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 114(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 18548527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
