BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15211505)

  • 1. The structural genomics experimental pipeline: insights from global target lists.
    O'Toole N; Grabowski M; Otwinowski Z; Minor W; Cygler M
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 15211505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coverage of protein sequence space by current structural genomics targets.
    O'Toole N; Raymond S; Cygler M
    J Struct Funct Genomics; 2003; 4(2-3):47-55. PubMed ID: 14649288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The RCSB PDB information portal for structural genomics.
    Kouranov A; Xie L; de la Cruz J; Chen L; Westbrook J; Bourne PE; Berman HM
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006 Jan; 34(Database issue):D302-5. PubMed ID: 16381872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of structural genomics: the first quindecennial.
    Grabowski M; Niedzialkowska E; Zimmerman MD; Minor W
    J Struct Funct Genomics; 2016 Mar; 17(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 26935210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Progress of structural genomics initiatives: an analysis of solved target structures.
    Todd AE; Marsden RL; Thornton JM; Orengo CA
    J Mol Biol; 2005 May; 348(5):1235-60. PubMed ID: 15854658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia.
    Bhattacharya A; Tejero R; Montelione GT
    Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 17186527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Higher-throughput approaches to crystallization and crystal structure determination.
    Fogg MJ; Wilkinson AJ
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2008 Aug; 36(Pt 4):771-5. PubMed ID: 18631156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic target selection for structural genomics on eukaryotes.
    Liu J; Hegyi H; Acton TB; Montelione GT; Rost B
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):188-200. PubMed ID: 15211504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NMR in structural genomics to increase structural coverage of the protein universe: Delivered by Prof. Kurt Wüthrich on 7 July 2013 at the 38th FEBS Congress in St. Petersburg, Russia.
    Serrano P; Dutta SK; Proudfoot A; Mohanty B; Susac L; Martin B; Geralt M; Jaroszewski L; Godzik A; Elsliger M; Wilson IA; Wüthrich K
    FEBS J; 2016 Nov; 283(21):3870-3881. PubMed ID: 27154589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Target selection for structural genomics.
    Brenner SE
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Nov; 7 Suppl():967-9. PubMed ID: 11104002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NMR screening and crystal quality of bacterially expressed prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins in a structural genomics pipeline.
    Page R; Peti W; Wilson IA; Stevens RC; Wüthrich K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Feb; 102(6):1901-5. PubMed ID: 15677718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting experimental properties of proteins from sequence by machine learning techniques.
    Smialowski P; Martin-Galiano AJ; Cox J; Frishman D
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2007 Apr; 8(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 17430194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PredPPCrys: accurate prediction of sequence cloning, protein production, purification and crystallization propensity from protein sequences using multi-step heterogeneous feature fusion and selection.
    Wang H; Wang M; Tan H; Li Y; Zhang Z; Song J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105902. PubMed ID: 25148528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-throughput computational and experimental techniques in structural genomics.
    Chance MR; Fiser A; Sali A; Pieper U; Eswar N; Xu G; Fajardo JE; Radhakannan T; Marinkovic N
    Genome Res; 2004 Oct; 14(10B):2145-54. PubMed ID: 15489337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Focusing in on structural genomics: the University of Queensland structural biology pipeline.
    Puri M; Robin G; Cowieson N; Forwood JK; Listwan P; Hu SH; Guncar G; Huber T; Kellie S; Hume DA; Kobe B; Martin JL
    Biomol Eng; 2006 Dec; 23(6):281-9. PubMed ID: 17097918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategies for improving crystallization success rates.
    Page R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 426():345-62. PubMed ID: 18542875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural genomics in North America.
    Terwilliger TC
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Nov; 7 Suppl():935-9. PubMed ID: 11103992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the dynamical incompleteness of the Protein Data Bank.
    Marino-Buslje C; Monzon AM; Zea DJ; Fornasari MS; Parisi G
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jan; 20(1):356-359. PubMed ID: 28981583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the accuracy of template-based structure prediction metaservers by comparison with structural genomics structures.
    Gront D; Grabowski M; Zimmerman MD; Raynor J; Tkaczuk KL; Minor W
    J Struct Funct Genomics; 2012 Dec; 13(4):213-25. PubMed ID: 23086054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A tour of structural genomics.
    Brenner SE
    Nat Rev Genet; 2001 Oct; 2(10):801-9. PubMed ID: 11584296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.