302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15212018)
1. Practice makes perfect: experience-related information should fall within the purview of Pennsylvania's doctrine of informed consent.
Rostolsky BM
Duquesne Law Rev; 2002; 40(3):543-60. PubMed ID: 15212018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Finding clarity in a Gray opinion: a critique of Pennsylvania's informed consent doctrine.
Kottkamp NA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1999; 61(1):241-85. PubMed ID: 16514782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The law of informed consent: from "doctor is right" to "patient has rights".
Kurtz SF
Syracuse Law Rev; 2000; 50(4):1243-60. PubMed ID: 16528861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dries v. Gregor: a case study of informed consent doctrine in New York.
Schreiber JA
N Y State Bar J; 1981 Oct; 53(6):431-7. PubMed ID: 16044597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pushing the limits of informed consent: Johnson v. Kokemoor and physician-specific disclosure.
Heinemann RA
Wis L Rev; 1997; 5():1079-121. PubMed ID: 16329220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The second revolution in informed consent: comparing physicians to each other.
Twerski AD; Cohen NB
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1999; 94(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 12455555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent in Oklahoma: a search for reasonableness and predictability in the aftermath of Scott v. Bradford.
Fisher ES
Oklahoma Law Rev; 1996; 49(4):651-75. PubMed ID: 16437817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Two kinds of statistics, the kind you look up and the kind you make up: a critical analysis of comparative provider statistics and the doctrine of informed consent.
Wolfberg J
Pepperdine Law Rev; 2002; 29(3):585-608. PubMed ID: 16482696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Jury clears cancer center of failing to tell participants of clinical-trial risks.
Blumenstyk G; Brainard J
Chron High Educ; 2004 Apr; 50(33):A33. PubMed ID: 15287145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A reversible decision on consent to sterilization.
Lee S
Law Q Rev; 1987 Oct; 103():513-5. PubMed ID: 16100807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed confusion: the doctrine of informed consent in Georgia.
Richards JH
Georgia Law Rev; 2003; 37(3):1129-66. PubMed ID: 15199938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. You can't get there from here: a case comment on Arndt v. Smith.
Nelson E; Caulfield T
Univ B C Law Rev; 1998; 32(2):353-64. PubMed ID: 12778911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tort law--informed consent to medical treatment: a case of medical negligence.
Gaughran N
Dubl Univ Law J; 1997; (19):178-97. PubMed ID: 12449972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The doctrine of informed consent: to inform or not to inform?
Walter P
St Johns Law Rev; 1997 Sep; 71(3):543-90. PubMed ID: 15732186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Waiting-list worries cause Calgary MDs to prepare letter for patients.
Lightstone S
CMAJ; 1999 Jul; 161(2):183-4. PubMed ID: 10454844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Doctors advised not to disclose illnesses on sick certificates without patients' signed consent.
Louw A
S Afr Med J; 2002 Nov; 92(11):840. PubMed ID: 12506576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent and surgeons' performance.
Clarke S; Oakley J
J Med Philos; 2004 Feb; 29(1):11-35. PubMed ID: 15449811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study.
Robertson GB
Osgoode Hall Law J; 1984; 22(1):139-61. PubMed ID: 16044612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Full disclosure of risks.
White SM; Baldwin TJ
Anaesthesia; 2005 Feb; 60(2):205. PubMed ID: 15644029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Medical care as physical injury from the viewpoint of the surgeon].
Neuhaus PJ
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1998 Oct; 92(8-9):542-6. PubMed ID: 9885156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
