184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15212023)
1. Human or animal: a resolution to the biotechnological blurring of the lines.
Cirlin L
Southwest Univ Law Rev; 2003; 32(3):501-25. PubMed ID: 15212023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Patents on human-animal chimeras and threats to human dignity.
Resnik DB
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(3):35-6. PubMed ID: 14594487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The human chimera patent initiative.
Newman SA
Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2002; 9(1):4, 7. PubMed ID: 15584183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Foreword: what hath (not) Chakrabarty wrought: from the mouse that roared to Hello Dolly and beyond.
Yonover GJ
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1998; 32(2):349-60. PubMed ID: 12710435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A legal perspective on humanity, personhood, and species boundaries.
Glenn LM
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(3):27-8. PubMed ID: 14594479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The human use of humanoid beings: chimeras and patent law.
Rabin S
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 16680130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. European Directive on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions: scope, status and controversies in a nutshell.
Hakki MM
E Law; 2004 Mar; 11(1):E4. PubMed ID: 16903025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Intellectual property in higher life forms: the patent system and controversial technologies.
Merges RP
MD Law Rev; 1988; 47(4):1051-75. PubMed ID: 16514761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. From Chakrabarty to chimeras: the growing need for evolutionary biology in patent law.
Iwasaka RM
Yale Law J; 2000 Apr; 109(6):1505-34. PubMed ID: 11010631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Patenting human beings: do sub-human creatures deserve constitutional protection?
Fishman RE
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):461-82. PubMed ID: 2699160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The monster's laws: a legal history of chimera research.
Appel JM
Genewatch; 2006; 19(2):12-6. PubMed ID: 16789302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Germany challenges human stem cell patent awarded 'by mistake'.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2000 Mar; 404(6773):3-4. PubMed ID: 10716411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patents, biotechnology, and hematologic pathology.
Kettelberger DM; Gambrell P; McClung G
Hematol Pathol; 1992; 6(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 1607346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rhône-Poulenc rounds up DeKalb and Monsanto.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Dec; 15(13):1332. PubMed ID: 9415877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Selective breeding and the patenting of living organisms.
Blunt P
Syracuse Law Rev; 1998; 48(3):1365-90. PubMed ID: 11657454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. European Commission rethinks biotech patents.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1175-6. PubMed ID: 12454654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Dr. Moreau has left the island: dealing with human-animal patents in the 21st century.
Jagels M
Thomas Jefferson Law Rev; 2000; 23(1):115-47. PubMed ID: 15080119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Harvard squeaks through oncomouse patent appeal.
Abbott A
Nature; 2001 Nov; 414(6861):241. PubMed ID: 11713493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A nail in the coffin for DNA sequence patents?
Yamanaka M
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1085-6. PubMed ID: 18846072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biotech patents: the world is your oyster--or mouse--or (you name it).
Alix JE
Technol Health Care; 1996 Sep; 4(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 8931235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
