These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15212028)

  • 1. The blooding of America: privacy and the DNA dragnet.
    Grand JS
    Cardozo Law Rev; 2002 Aug; 23(6):2277-323. PubMed ID: 15212028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The precarious implications of DNA profiling.
    Smith JC
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(3):865-88. PubMed ID: 11655079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic privacy: constitutional considerations in forensic DNA testing.
    Burk DL; Hess JA
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1994; 5(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11657430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expanding databases, declining liberties.
    Simoncelli T; Wallace H
    Genewatch; 2006; 19(1):3-8, 18. PubMed ID: 16789300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Arresting evidence.
    Dawkins R
    Sciences (New York); 1998; 38(6):20-5. PubMed ID: 11657757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guilt by association: should the law be able to use one person's DNA to carry out surveillance on their family? Not without a public debate.
    Bieber FR; Lazer D
    New Sci; 2004 Oct 23-29; 184(2470):20. PubMed ID: 15573446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners.
    Love SH
    Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic privacy, abandonment, and DNA dragnets: Is Fourth Amendment jurisprudence adequate?
    Fernandez HK
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 15799497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quietly, DNA testing transforms sleuth's job -- but practice alarms civil libertarians.
    Rohde D
    N Y Times Web; 1999 Mar; ():B1, B5. PubMed ID: 11647661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proxy consent and a national DNA databank: an unethical and discriminatory combination.
    Baumann TK
    Iowa Law Rev; 2001 Jan; 86(2):667-701. PubMed ID: 16184651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An international DNA database: balancing hope, privacy, and scientific error.
    Puri A
    Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 2001; 24(2):341-80. PubMed ID: 12715819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Criminal DNA data banks: revolution for law enforcement or threat to individual privacy?
    Yee YH
    Am J Crim Law; 1995; 22(2):461-90. PubMed ID: 11655161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A feminist Fourth Amendment?: Consent, care, privacy, and social meaning in Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Taslitz AE
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():1-79. PubMed ID: 14986665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Liberty, privacy, and DNA databases.
    Rosen C
    New Atlantis; 2003; (1):37-52. PubMed ID: 15584193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sanders v. Coman.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. North Carolina, W.D.
    Fed Suppl; 1994 Oct; 864():496-502. PubMed ID: 11648290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DNA databanks giving police a powerful weapon, and critics.
    Goldberg C
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The secrets of the genome revealed: threats to genetic privacy.
    Doot GM
    Wayne Law Rev; 1991; 37(3):1615-45. PubMed ID: 11659542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Norplant condition: one step forward or two steps back?
    Ballard T
    Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():139-87. PubMed ID: 11652871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Family ties: the use of DNA offender databases to catch offenders' kin.
    Greely HT; Riordan DP; Garrison NA; Mountain JL
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):248-62. PubMed ID: 16789947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can the government get into your genes?: A proposed New York statute for the use of genetic identification to establish probable cause.
    Cavoli JG
    Albany Law Rev; 1992; 55(4):1355-414. PubMed ID: 11652956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.