685 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15212030)
1. Taking another look at the definition of an embryo: President Bush's criteria and the problematic application of federal regulations to human embryonic stem cells.
Auerbach SB
Emory Law J; 2002; 51(4):1557-604. PubMed ID: 15212030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Promoting life?: Embryonic stem cell research legislation.
Miller JF
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2003; 52(2):437-79. PubMed ID: 15214335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Embryos, stem cells, morality and public policy: difficult connections.
Momeyer RW
Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 15156894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dipping into Uncle Sam's pockets: federal funding of stem cell research: is it legal?
Goldstein C
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 2002; 11(2-3):229-59. PubMed ID: 15212067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination.
Fujikawa R
South Calif Law Rev; 2005 May; 78(4):1075-124. PubMed ID: 17340756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere.
Kim S
Hastings Womens Law J; 2003; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Federally funding human embryonic stem cell research: an administrative analysis.
Gross GS
Wis L Rev; 2000; 4():855-84. PubMed ID: 12664903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Federal funding of human embryo stem cell research: advocating a broader approach.
Braswell JR
Chic Kent Law Rev; 2003; 78(1):423-43. PubMed ID: 15156895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reaction to President Bush's decision on embryonic stem-cell research.
Fiorenza J; Keeler W; Rigali J; D'Arcy J; Law B; O'Malley S; Flynn H; Bevilacqua A; McCarrick T; Egan E; O'Steen D; Maida A; Place M
Origins; 2001 Aug; 31(12):205, 207-13. PubMed ID: 11838493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Embryonic stem-cell research exempt from ban, NIH is told.
Wadman M
Nature; 1999 Jan; 397(6716):185-6. PubMed ID: 9930681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Washington insider. The elections and Congress: a continued statement on embryo research?
Doerflinger RM
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 15887337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Embryonic stem cells. Rumors and trial balloons precede Bush's funding decision.
Vogel G
Science; 2001 Jul; 293(5528):186-7. PubMed ID: 11452086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A postmodernist take on the human embryo research debate.
Noah L
Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1133-61. PubMed ID: 15868678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Senators grill NIH director over restrictions on stem-cell research.
Brainard J
Chron High Educ; 2003 Jun; 49(39):A25. PubMed ID: 15287128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The intersection of law and medicine: the case for providing federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
Newhart AB
Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):329-61. PubMed ID: 16485376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. House challenges Bush's limits on embryonic-stem-cell research.
Brainard J
Chron High Educ; 2005 Jun; 51(39):A17. PubMed ID: 16018100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Federal funding and the regulation of embryonic stem cell research: the Pontius Pilate maneuver.
Levine RJ
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():552-64. PubMed ID: 19757720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Stem-cell lines.
Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 May; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15966127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Destroying human embryos for research.
National Catholic Bioethics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Ethics Medics; 2000 Mar; 25(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12201302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Stem cell research and conditional federal funding: do state laws allowing more extensive research pose a problem for federalism?
Schiller C
Pepperdine Law Rev; 2004 May; 31(4):1017-54. PubMed ID: 16514766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
