These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15212035)

  • 21. The nature of the right to an abortion: a commentary on Professor Brownstein's analysis of Casey.
    West RL
    Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):961-7. PubMed ID: 11656423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G
    Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Justice Blackmun and legal abortion--a besieged legacy to women's reproductive health.
    Cates W; Grimes DA; Hogue LL
    Am J Public Health; 1995 Sep; 85(9):1204-6. PubMed ID: 7661225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.
    Nivala J
    Const Law J; 1993; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Court rules that government can't outlaw type of abortion: a Nebraska case.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2000 Jun; ():A1. PubMed ID: 15586921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the role of stare decisis.
    Laird V
    Mod Law Rev; 1994 May; 57(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 11656439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stenberg v. Carhart.
    Bostrom BA
    Issues Law Med; 2000; 16(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 11130929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. WomanCare of Southfield, P.C. v. Granholm.
    United States. District Court, Michigan
    Wests Fed Suppl; 2001; 143():849-55. PubMed ID: 16479702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Sullivan PA; Goldzwig SR
    Q J Speech; 1995 May; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Court backs states on abortion.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1989 Jul; 262(4):451-2. PubMed ID: 2739042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
    Intromasso C
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2003; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Justices reaffirm abortion access for emergencies.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 16429624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
    Destro RA
    Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.