211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15212038)
1. Stenberg v. Carhart: have the states lost their power to regulate abortion?
Gauthier AM
New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(3):625-68. PubMed ID: 15212038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
Joersz M
N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Stenberg v. Carhart: women retain their right to choose.
Berkowitz JF
J Crim Law Criminol; 2001; 91(2):337-83. PubMed ID: 12774791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive?
Guenther H
Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(3):1021-44. PubMed ID: 16211757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?
Schmutz SD
Houst Law Rev; 2002; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
Heffernan L
Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. State's partial-birth abortion ban supported.
Chopko M; Moses M
Origins; 2000 Mar; 29(38):617-23. PubMed ID: 11913443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Justices to review federal ban on disputed abortion method; case may hinge on Alito, Court's newest member.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 16514736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
Gough AD
Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
Borgmann CE
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Candor and the court: the Supreme Court will confront as never before the violent nature of mid- and later-term abortion.
Stith R
America (NY); 2000 Apr; 182(11):13-5. PubMed ID: 11913437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court rules that government can't outlaw type of abortion: a Nebraska case.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2000 Jun; ():A1. PubMed ID: 15586921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Partial-truth abortion bans.
Kaminer W
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):17-8. PubMed ID: 16830438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely!
Massie AM
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The vagueness of partial-birth abortion bans: deconstruction or destruction?
Rurka ML
J Crim Law Criminol; 1999; 89(4):1233-68. PubMed ID: 14628850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "Partial birth" abortion and the health exception: protecting maternal health or risking abortion on demand?
Glidewell G
Fordham Urban Law J; 2001 Apr; 28(4):1089-150. PubMed ID: 12680381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
Gordon A
Harvard J Legis; 2004; 41(2):501-15. PubMed ID: 16596750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Justices reaffirm abortion access for emergencies.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 16429624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Congress ignores the parameters of the health exception. Judicial responses to congressional evidence and partial-birth abortion in Thewake of Stenberg v. Carhart.
Bailey BJ
J Leg Med; 2006 Mar; 27(1):71-85. PubMed ID: 16510366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal failure or moral success? An evaluation of the ban on partial-birth abortion.
Kolenc AB
America (NY); 2004 Nov; 191(17):11-4. PubMed ID: 15675070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
