These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15212038)
41. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade. Stith R William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The federal ban on so-called "partial-birth abortion" is a dangerous intrusion into medical practice. Blumenthal PD MedGenMed; 2003 Jun; 5(2):37. PubMed ID: 14603136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases. Ehrlich JS Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court. Bertz RC West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision. Kendall CC John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Fourteenth Amendment unenumerated rights jurisprudence: an essay in response to Stenberg v. Carhart. Smolin DM Harv J Law Public Policy; 2001; 24(3):815-39. PubMed ID: 16594113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Lochner redeemed: family privacy after Troxel and Carhart. Meyer DD UCLA Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 48(5):1125-90. PubMed ID: 16273684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Bush signs ban on a procedure for abortions. Stevenson RW N Y Times Web; 2003 Nov; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 14621706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The Carhart case and late-term abortions -- what's next in Australia? Faunce T; Jefferys S J Law Med; 2007 Aug; 15(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 17902487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Kassop N PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The 1983 abortion decisions: Virginia distinguished. Med Leg Bull; 1983; 32(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 6680764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Congressional control of federal court jurisdiction: the case study of abortion. Greenwood JS S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(4):1069-112. PubMed ID: 16493841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation. Van Detta JA South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Jon O. Newman and the abortion decisions: a remarkable first year. Hurwitz AD NY Law Sch Law Rev; 2002-2003; 46(1-2):231-47. PubMed ID: 16493839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Review of abortion policy: legality, medicaid funding, and parental involvement, 1967-1994. Merz JF; Jackson CA; Klerman JA Womens Rights Law Report; 1995; 17(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11863033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Physician assistant as abortion provider: lessons from Vermont, New York, and Montana. Schirmer JT Hastings Law J; 1997 Nov; 49(1):253-88. PubMed ID: 14758819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. "Partial-birth abortion" and the Supreme Court. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2001 Jan; 344(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 11150367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Air Force women's access to abortion services and the erosion of 10 U.S.C., section 1093. Wilde ML William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):351-412. PubMed ID: 15977327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]