These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15212076)
1. DNA databanks: when has a good thing gone too far? Herlica DA Syracuse Law Rev; 2002; 52(3):951-77. PubMed ID: 15212076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Willing to give up their DNA, but privacy too? Donnan S Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Apr; 92(99):1, 9. PubMed ID: 15586925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandatory genetic dogtags and the Fourth Amendment: the need for a new post-Skinner test. Scherer RC Georgetown Law J; 1997 Jun; 85(6):2007-38. PubMed ID: 16523576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Canada's DNA databank: public safety and private costs. Parfett J Manit Law J; 2002; 29(1):33-79. PubMed ID: 16514758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice. Juengst ET Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Who needs special needs? On the constitutionality of collecting DNA and other biometric data from arrestees. Kaye DH J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 16789942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA fingerprinting and civil liberties. Noble AA J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 16789939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing Fourth Amendment challenges to DNA extraction statutes after Samson v. California. Nerko CJ Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Nov; 77(2):917-49. PubMed ID: 19353834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beware! Uncle Sam has your DNA: legal fallout from its use and misuse in the U.S. Weiss MJ Ethics Inf Technol; 2004; 6(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 16969961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When privacy fails: invoking a property paradigm to mandate the destruction of DNA samples. Harlan LM Duke Law J; 2004 Oct; 53(7):179-219. PubMed ID: 15736315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Statutory frameworks for regulating information flows: drawing lessons for the DNA data banks from other government data systems. Lazer D; Mayer-Schönberger V J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):366-74. PubMed ID: 16789957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA databanks, public opinion and the law. Caulfield T; Outerbridge T Clin Invest Med; 2002 Dec; 25(6):252-6. PubMed ID: 12516996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Big brother and his science kit: DNA databases for 21st century crime control? Tracy PE; Morgan V J Crim Law Criminol; 2000; 90(2):635-90. PubMed ID: 16180286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Will DNA profiling fuel prejudice? Gosline A New Sci; 2005 Apr 9-15; 186(2494):12-3. PubMed ID: 16007760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA profiles, computer searches, and the Fourth Amendment. Kimel CW Duke Law J; 2013; 62(4):933-73. PubMed ID: 23461001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA databases: when fear goes too far. Peterson RS Am Crim Law Rev; 2000; 37(3):1219-38. PubMed ID: 11958233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. DNA databanks: law enforcement's greatest surveillance tool? Hibbert M Wake Forest Law Rev; 1999; 34(3):767-825. PubMed ID: 12664925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retention of offender DNA samples necessary to ensure and monitor quality of forensic DNA efforts: appropriate safeguards exist to protect the DNA samples from misuse. Herkenham MD J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 16789959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA analysis and the Freedom of Information Act: information or invasion? Might C Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 2001; 26(2):773-95. PubMed ID: 12741386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]