These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15212080)

  • 1. The socio-legal acceptance of new technologies: a close look at artificial insemination.
    Bernstein G
    Wash Law Rev; 2002 Oct; 77(4):1035-120. PubMed ID: 15212080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The birds, the bees, and the deep freeze: is there international consensus in the debate over assisted reproductive technologies?
    Pitrolo EA
    Houst J Int Law; 1996; 19(1):147-206. PubMed ID: 12666682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Infertility and bioethical issues of the new reproductive technologies.
    Herz EK
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1989 Mar; 12(1):117-31. PubMed ID: 2652103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New reproductive technologies: some legal dilemmas.
    Donovan P
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1986; 18(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 3792523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New methods of conception and their legal status.
    Pilpel HF
    N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1985; 3():13-33. PubMed ID: 16100809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Where does a man stand on issues of assisted reproduction, surrogacy, artificial insemination within lesbian relationships and posthumous conception?
    Beem P
    Aust J Fam Law; 2004 Apr; 18(1):41-62. PubMed ID: 17058336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond conception: legal determinations of filiation in the context of assisted reproductive technologies.
    Mykitiuk R
    Osgoode Hall Law J; 2001; 39(4):771-815. PubMed ID: 16528850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Legal issues of the new reproductive technologies.
    Kinney LH
    Calif State Bar J; 1977; 52(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 11665044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Forensic medicine aspects of surrogate mothers and artificial insemination].
    Dufková J
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1989; 47():349-59. PubMed ID: 2818503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Privacy and the regulation of the new reproductive technologies: a decision-making approach.
    Sedillo Lopez A
    Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):173-97. PubMed ID: 16100818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social acceptance of new techniques of child conception.
    Matteson RL; Terranova G
    J Soc Psychol; 1977 Apr; 101(2nd Half):225-9. PubMed ID: 11663303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legal aspects of ART practice in Israel.
    Schenker JG
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2003 Jul; 20(7):250-9. PubMed ID: 12921263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An international view of surgically assisted conception and surrogacy tourism.
    Ahmad N
    Med Leg J; 2011; 79(Pt 4):135-45. PubMed ID: 22156300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The development and application of the modern reproductive technologies to horse breeding.
    Allen WR
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2005 Aug; 40(4):310-29. PubMed ID: 16008761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wombs for rent: an examination of prohibitory and regulatory approaches to governing preconception arrangements.
    Chen M
    Health Law Can; 2003 Feb; 23(3):33-50. PubMed ID: 12674583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technologies: professional and legal restrictions in Australian clinics.
    Petersen K; Baker HW; Pitts M; Thorpe R
    J Law Med; 2005 Feb; 12(3):373-85. PubMed ID: 15754559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Islamic viewpoint on new assisted reproductive technologies.
    Fadel HE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):147-57. PubMed ID: 15868666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who is the parent in cloning?
    Elster N
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1999; 27(3):533-55. PubMed ID: 12650149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The case against surrogate parenting.
    Krimmel HT
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):35-9. PubMed ID: 6643035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.