These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15212210)

  • 1. Research implications of science-informed, value-based decision making.
    Dowie J
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 15212210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementing the Precautionary Principle: incorporating science, technology, fairness, and accountability in environmental, health, and safety decisions.
    Ashford NA
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 15212207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Precautionary principles: a jurisdiction-free framework for decision-making under risk.
    Ricci PF; Cox LA; MacDonald TR
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2004 Dec; 23(12):579-600. PubMed ID: 15688986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical judgement in the interpretation of evidence: A Bayesian approach.
    Harbison J
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Dec; 15(12):1489-97. PubMed ID: 17118071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When is enough evidence enough? - Using systematic decision analysis and value-of-information analysis to determine the need for further evidence.
    Siebert U; Rochau U; Claxton K
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):575-84. PubMed ID: 24315327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review.
    Spiegelhalter DJ; Myles JP; Jones DR; Abrams KR
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(38):1-130. PubMed ID: 11134920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Bayesian-utilitarian and maximin principle approaches.
    Comba P; Martuzzi M; Botti C
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(1):193-6. PubMed ID: 15212224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring uncertainty in complex decision analysis models.
    Parmigiani G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2002 Dec; 11(6):513-37. PubMed ID: 12516987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Late lessons from early warnings: towards precaution and realism in research and policy.
    Gee D; Krayer von Krauss MP
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):25-34. PubMed ID: 16304931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancing informatics competency under uncertainty at the point of decision: a knowing about knowing vision.
    Kaltoft MK; Nielsen JB; Salkeld G; Dowie J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():975-9. PubMed ID: 25160333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision analysis in forensic science.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Aitken C
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):894-905. PubMed ID: 16078494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precaution, uncertainty and causation in environmental decisions.
    Ricci PF; Rice D; Ziagos J; Cox LA
    Environ Int; 2003 Apr; 29(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 12605931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Precautionary Principle: implications for risk management strategies.
    Saltelli A; Funtowicz S
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 15212206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of information analysis for interventional and counterfactual Bayesian networks in forensic medical sciences.
    Constantinou AC; Yet B; Fenton N; Neil M; Marsh W
    Artif Intell Med; 2016 Jan; 66():41-52. PubMed ID: 26395654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.
    Bianchi MT; Alexander BM; Cash SS
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 18812583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can Bayesian methods make data and analyses more relevant to decision makers? A perspective from Medicare.
    Sheingold SH
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 11329838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Conclusions. The precautionary principle: its advantages and risks].
    Tubiana M
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2000; 184(5):969-93. PubMed ID: 11077719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of the Precautionary Principle: is it a threat to science?
    Goldstein BD; Carruth RS
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 15212219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.